JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol (July 25, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01311.2006 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Media Files
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/2038    most recent
01311.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiete, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Seung, H S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiete, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Seung, H S.
Submitted on December 14, 2006
Accepted on July 13, 2007

Model of birdsong learning based on gradient estimation by dynamic perturbation of neural conductances

Ila R. Fiete1*, Michael S. Fee2, and H Sebastian Seung3

1 Division of Biology, Caltech, Pasadena, California, United States
2 Brain and Cognitive Science and McGovern Institute, MIT, United States
3 Brain and Cognitive Sciences and HHMI, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ilafiete{at}caltech.edu.

We propose a model of songbird learning that focuses on avian brain areas HVC and RA, involved in song production, and area LMAN, important for generating song variability. Plasticity at HVC$\to$RA synapses is driven by hypothetical ``rules'' depending on three signals: activation of HVC-->RA synapses, activation of LMAN-->RA synapses, and reinforcement from an internal critic that compares the bird's own song with a memorized template of an adult tutor's song. Fluctuating glutamatergic input to RA from LMAN generates behavioral variability for trial-and-error learning. The plasticity rules perform gradient-based reinforcement learning in a spiking neural network model of song production. Although the reinforcement signal is delayed, temporally imprecise, and binarized, the model learns in a reasonable amount of time in numerical simulations. Varying the number of neurons in HVC and RA has little effect on learning time. The model makes specific predictions for the induction of bidirectional long-term plasticity at HVC-->RA synapses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Jarosiewicz, S. M. Chase, G. W. Fraser, M. Velliste, R. E. Kass, and A. B. Schwartz
Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain-computer interface paradigm
PNAS, December 9, 2008; 105(49): 19486 - 19491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. H. Kao, B. D. Wright, and A. J. Doupe
Neurons in a Forebrain Nucleus Required for Vocal Plasticity Rapidly Switch between Precise Firing and Variable Bursting Depending on Social Context
J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13232 - 13247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. T. Sakata and M. S. Brainard
Online Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Neural Activity in Avian Song Control Circuitry
J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11378 - 11390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
T. F. Roberts, M. E. Klein, M. F. Kubke, J. M. Wild, and R. Mooney
Telencephalic Neurons Monosynaptically Link Brainstem and Forebrain Premotor Networks Necessary for Song
J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3479 - 3489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.