|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Neuromotor Physiology, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, RM, Italy
3 Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
4 Univ. of Rome, Italy; Department of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: y.ivanenko{at}hsantalucia.it.
Leg segment rotations in human walking covary, so that the 3D trajectory of temporal changes in the elevation angles lies close to a plane. Recently, the role of central vs. biomechanical constraints on the kinematics control of human locomotion has been questioned. Here we show, based on both modeling and experimental data, that the planar law of inter-segmental coordination is not a simple consequence of biomechanics. First, the full limb behavior in various locomotion modes (walking on inclined surface, staircase stepping, air-stepping, crouched walking, hopping) can be expressed as the 2 degrees of freedom planar motion even though the orientation of the plane and pairwise segment angle correlations may differ substantially. Second, planar covariation is not an inevitable outcome of any locomotor movement. It can be systematically violated in some conditions (e.g., when stooping and grasping an object on the floor during walking or in toddlers at the onset of independent walking) or transferred into a simple linear relationship in others (e.g., during stepping in place). Finally, all three major limb segments contribute importantly to planar covariation and its characteristics resulting in a certain endpoint trajectory defined by the limb axis length and orientation. Recent advances in the neural control of movement support the hypothesis about central representation of kinematics components.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |