JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 10, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01305.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/1941    most recent
01305.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Phan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Phan, M.
Submitted on December 13, 2006
Accepted on January 3, 2007

Responses of the Rat Olfactory Epithelium to Retronasal Air Flow

John W. Scott1*, Humberto P Acevedo2, Lisa Sherrill2, and Maggie Phan3

1 Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
2 Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
3 Nutrition and Health Sciences Program, Division of Biological and Biomedical Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: johns{at}cellbio.emory.edu.

Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium were assessed with the electroolfactogram while odorants were presented to the external nares with an artificial sniff or to the internal nares by positive pressure. A series of seven odorants that varied from very polar, hydrophilic odorants to very non-polar, hydrophobic odorants were used. While the polar odorants activated the dorsal olfactory epithelium when presented by the external nares (orthonasal presentation), they were not effective when forced through the nasal cavity from the internal nares (retronasal presentation). However, the non-polar odorants were effective in both stimulus modes. These results were independent of stimulus concentration or of humidity of the carrier air. Similar results were obtained with multiunit recording from olfactory bulb. These results help to explain why human investigations often report differences in the sensation or ability to discriminate odorants presented orthonasally vs. retronasally. The results also strongly support the importance of odorant sorption in normal olfactory processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Scott and L. Sherrill
Effects of Odor Stimulation on Antidromic Spikes in Olfactory Sensory Neurons
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3074 - 3085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.