JN Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01035.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1127    most recent
01035.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by English, A. W
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by English, A. W
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X. Y.
Submitted on September 27, 2006
Accepted on November 16, 2006

RECOVERY OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY AFTER TRANSECTION AND SURGICAL REPAIR OF THE RAT SCIATIC NERVE

Arthur W English1*, Yi Chen2, Jonathan S Carp2, Jonathan R Wolpaw2, and Xiang Yang Chen2

1 Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
2 Lab of Nervous System Disorders, Wadsworth Center NYS Dept Health & State University at Albany, Albany, New York, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: art{at}cellbio.emory.edu.

The recovery of soleus (SOL), gastrocnemius (GAS), and tibialis anterior (TA) electromyographic activity (EMG) after transection and surgical repair of the sciatic nerve was studied in Sprague-Dawley rats using chronically implanted stimulation and recording electrodes. Spontaneous EMG activity in SOL and GAS and direct muscle (M) responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation persisted for up to 2 days after sciatic nerve transection, but SOL and GAS H-reflexes disappeared immediately. Spontaneous EMG activity began to return 2-3 weeks after transection, rose nearly to pre-transection levels by 60 days, and persisted for the duration of the study period (120 days). Recovery of stimulus-evoked EMG responses began about 30 days after sciatic nerve transection as multiple small responses with a wide range of latencies. Over time, the latencies of these fractionated responses shortened, their amplitudes increased, and they merged into a distinct short-latency component (the putative M response) and a distinct long-latency component (the putative H-reflex). The extent of recovery of stimulation-evoked EMG was modest: even 100 days after sciatic nerve transection, the responses were still much smaller than those before transection. Similar gradual development of responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation was also seen in TA, suggesting that some regenerating fibers sent branches into both tibial and common peroneal nerves.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.