JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 6, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00929.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/769    most recent
00929.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weyand, T. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weyand, T. G
Submitted on September 1, 2006
Accepted on June 4, 2007

Retinogeniculate transmission in wakefulness

Theodore G Weyand1*

1 Cell Biology & Anatomy, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tweyan{at}lsuhsc.edu.

Despite popular belief that the primary function of the thalamus is to gate sensory inputs by state, few studies have attempted to directly characterize the efficacy of such gating in the awake, behaving animal. I measured efficacy of retinogeniculate transmission in the awake cat by taking advantage of the fact that many neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are dominated by a single retinal input, and that this input produces a distinct event known as the S-potential. Retinal input failed to produce an LGN action potential half of the time. However, success or failure was powerfully tied to the recency of the S-potential. Short intervals tend to be successful, and long intervals unsuccessful. For 4 of 12 neurons, the probability that a given S-potential could cause a spike exceeded 90% if that S-potential was preceded by an S-potential within the previous 10 msec (100 Hz). Whereas this temporal influence on efficacy has been demonstrated extensively in anesthetized animals, wakefulness is different in several ways. In wakefulness, overall efficacy is better, the duration of facilitating effects are briefer, efficacy of long intervals is superior, and the temporal dependence can be briefly disrupted by altering background illumination. Finally, S-potential amplitude, duration, and even slope are dynamic and systematic within wakefulness; providing further support that the S-potential is the extracellular signature of the retinal EPSP.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.