JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 20, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00900.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/2647    most recent
00900.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumbhani, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, L. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumbhani, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, L. A
Submitted on August 23, 2006
Accepted on June 15, 2007

Precision, Reliability and Information Theoretic Analysis of Visual Thalamocortical Neurons

Romesh Devjibhai Kumbhani1, Mark J Nolt2, and Larry A Palmer2*

1 Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: palmerl{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

High-order statistics of neural responses allow one to gain insight into neural function that may not be evident from firing rate alone. In this study, we compared the precision, reliability, and information content of spike trains from X- and Y-cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and layer IV simple cells of area 17 in the cat. To a stochastic, contrast-modulated Gabor patch, layer IV simple cells responded as precisely as their primary inputs, LGN X-cells, but less reliably. LGN Y-cells were more precise and reliable than LGN X-cells. Also, within each LGN cell type, (1) responses to the same stimulus were nearly identical if they shared the same center sign; (2) responses of neurons with the same center sign were nearly identical to the responses of neurons of opposite center sign if the stimulus' contrasts were inverted. These results suggest simple cells receive highly precise and synchronous LGN input, resulting in precise responses. Nonetheless, the response precision of simple cells was greater than expected. Finally, information theoretic calculations of our cell responses revealed that (1) LGN X-cells encoded information at half the rate of LGN Y-cells but 2.5 times the rate of layer IV simple cells; (2) LGN cells encoded information in their responses using temporal patterns while simple cells did not; and (3) simple cells used more of their information capacity than LGN X-cells. We propose mechanisms that simple cells might use to ensure high precision.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. H. Kao, B. D. Wright, and A. J. Doupe
Neurons in a Forebrain Nucleus Required for Vocal Plasticity Rapidly Switch between Precise Firing and Variable Bursting Depending on Social Context
J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13232 - 13247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.