JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 89: 229-236, 2003. First published October 10, 2002; doi:10.1152/jn.00488.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/229    most recent
00488.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xia, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xia, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, G. G.

J Neurophysiol (January 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00488.2002
Submitted on Submitted 20 June 2002; accepted in final form 10 October 2002

Na+ Channel Expression and Neuronal Function in the Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 Null Mutant Mouse

Ying Xia,1 Peng Zhao,1 Jin Xue,1 Xiang Q. Gu,1 Xiaolu Sun,1 Hang Yao,1 and Gabriel G. Haddad1,2

Departments of  1Pediatrics (Section of Respiratory Medicine) and  2Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Xia, Ying, Peng Zhao, Jin Xue, Xiang Q. Gu, Xiaolu Sun, Hang Yao, and Gabriel G. Haddad. Na+ Channel Expression and Neuronal Function in the Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 Null Mutant Mouse. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 229-236, 2003. Mice lacking Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) suffer from recurrent seizures and die early postnatally. Although the mechanisms for seizures are not well established, our previous electrophysiological work has shown that neuronal excitability and Na+ current density are increased in hippocampal CA1 neurons of these mutant mice. However, it is unknown whether this increased density is related to altered expression or functional regulation of Na+ channels. In this work, we asked three questions: is the increased excitability limited to CA1 neurons, is the increased Na+ current density related to an increased Na+ channel expression, and, if so, which Na+ channel subtype(s) is upregulated? Using neurophysiological, autoradiographic, and immunoblotting techniques, we showed that both CA1 and cortical neurons have an increase in membrane excitability and Na+ current density; Na+ channel density is selectively upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex (P < 0.05); and Na+ channel subtype I is significantly increased in the hippocampus and Na+ channel subtype II is increased in the cortex. Our results demonstrate that mice lacking NHE1 upregulate their Na+ channel expression in the hippocampal and cortical regions selectively; this leads to an increase in Na+ current density and membrane excitability. We speculate that neuronal overexcitability due to Na+ channel upregulation in the hippocampus and cortex forms the basis of epileptic seizures in NHE1 mutant mice.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Neuronal function depends in a major way on plasma membrane protein expression (Banasiak et al. 2000; Cummins et al. 1994; Fanning and Anderson 1999; Haddad and Jiang 1993). An abnormal expression of membrane proteins may lead to disturbed neuronal function and neurological disorders (Banasiak et al. 2000; Haddad and Jiang 1993; Steinlein et al. 2000; Xia et al. 2000). For example, mice lacking Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) show epileptic seizures, which appear by age 2-3 wk postnatally, leading to an early death in most cases (Bell et al. 1999; Cox et al. 1997). The basis for the seizures in the mice is not well understood.

Using an electrophysiological approach, we have recently observed that neuronal excitability and Na+ current density are increased in freshly dissociated hippocampal neurons from these mice (Gu et al. 2001). Because Na+ channels are critical for setting the firing threshold and neuronal excitability (Cummins et al. 1993; Catterall 1992; Urenjak and Obrenovitch 1996; Xia et al. 2000), it is highly likely that an increase in the macroscopic Na+ currents could play a central role in facilitating the induction of seizures in these mutant mice. It is not known, however, whether this Na+ current upregulation is related to an increase in Na+ channel density or to an alteration in Na+ channel conductance or open probability. Furthermore, it is not clear as to whether these changes in the Na+ current are limited to one region or more generalized in the CNS. We have therefore performed this work to determine whether Na+ channel expression is altered in multiple regions of the NHE1 null mutant brain. To provide correlative functional analysis, we also used electrophysiological techniques to study the properties of neurons in two different regions, i.e., the CA1 area and the neocortex.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals

B6SJL, +/swe (slow-wave epilepsy) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) (Cox et al. 1997). These heterozygous mice were mated in our institution and the resulting homozygous NHE1 mutant (25%) F1 mice progeny were used between postnatal days 20 and 30. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care Committee of Yale University School of Medicine, which is accredited by the American Association of Laboratory Animal Care.

NHE1 mutant mice genotyping

Although homozygous mutant mice had a clear phenotype consisting of locomotor ataxia in the hindlimbs and slow, wide-based gait and coarse truncal instability starting at ~2-3 wk of age, we performed genotyping on all presumed mutant mice to confirm the phenotype with a PCR-based test. This has been described in previous publications (Yao et al. 1999).

Chemicals and reagents

3H-saxitoxin (21 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Unlabeled saxitoxin (STX) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) was from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemicals and Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI).

Tissue preparation

The animals were decapitated after halothane inhalational anesthesia and their brains were rapidly removed. For patch-clamp recording, the CA1 and neocortex were dissected out for neuronal dissociation. For autoradiographic studies, brains from age-matched control mice were simultaneously removed and frozen in dry ice-cold 2-methylbutane and then stored at -80°C freezer. Ten-micrometer coronal sections were cut in a Hacker-Bright cryostat at -20°C and mounted onto gelatin-coated microscope slides. For Western blots, the hippocampal and cortical tissues were dissected out and pooled for microsomal preparations.

Cell preparation for patch recording

The hippocampus and cortex were removed from the animals and sliced into 7-10 transverse sections of 400 µm thick. The slices were immediately transferred to a container with 10 ml of fresh, oxygenated, and slightly stirred HEPES buffer at room temperature. After 30 min of exposure to trypsin (0.08%) and 20 min of protease (0.05%) digestion, the slices were washed several times with HEPES buffer and left in oxygenated solution. The CA1 or cortical tissues were then dissected out and triturated in a small volume (0.25 ml) of HEPES buffer.

Electrophysiological solutions

The external HEPES solution bathing neurons for enzymatic treatment and electrophysiological recording contained (in mM) 130 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4). The pipette solution for whole cell patch electrodes contained (in mM) 138 KCl, 0.2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES (Na+ salt), and 10 EGTA, and an adjusted pH of 7.4 with Tris. Osmolarity of all solutions was adjusted to 290 mOsm.

Recording criteria

MORPHOLOGICAL CRITERIA. Cells were used if they had a smooth surface, had a three-dimensional contour, and were pyramidal in shape. Similar criteria have been used by us (Cummins et al. 1993; Gu et al. 2001) and others (Hamill et al. 1981) on freshly triturated neurons.

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL CRITERIA. Neurons were considered for recording if the seal resistance was >5 GOmega , a holding current was <0.1 nA (command potential -100 mV), and series resistance was <10 MOmega . The series resistances were compensated at 90% level with the Axopatch 1C amplifier (Axon Instruments). Under these conditions, the error caused by uncompensated series resistances was <5 mV. To obtain adequate voltage clamp and minimize the space-clamp problem, only small neurons with short processes were used in INa+ measurements.

Electrophysiological recordings

Electrodes were pulled on a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller (Model P-87, Sutter Instrument) from filamented borosilicate capillary glass (1.2 mm OD, 0.69 mm ID, World Precision Instruments). The electrodes were fire-polished, and their resistances were 2-5 MOmega for voltage-clamp experiments and 5-8 MOmega for current-clamp experiments. Action potentials were recorded in the current-clamp mode, and Rm was measured at -70 mV as a slope of the current trace evoked by a ramp voltage from -160 to 100 mV in the voltage-clamp mode against the voltage. Current traces were leak-subtracted, and Vm was measured at current-clamp mode with no holding current. Junction potentials were nulled for each individual cell with the Axopatch 1C amplifier. All recordings were performed at room temperature (22-24°C).

3H-STX binding and autoradiography

The methods used are the same as in our previous work (Cummins et al. 1993; Xia and Haddad 1993; Xia et al. 2000). In brief, mouse brains were cut at three major levels, i.e., rostral, midbrain and brain stem levels. At each level, two to four consecutive sections were used for autoradiography. All slice-mounted slides were preincubated for 15 min in the binding buffer [(in mM) 20 Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 140 N-methyl-D-glucamine, 5.4 KCl, 2.8 CaCl2, and 1.3 MgSO4] to remove putative endogenous ligand. Brain tissues were then labeled at room temperature for 60 min in the same buffer with 4 nM 3H-STX. Nonspecific binding was measured in separate slices from the same brain levels of the same mice by adding 5 µM of unlabeled TTX in the binding buffer. The incubated slides were rinsed in seven different jars containing the same buffer without any labeled or unlabelled STX at 4°C and finally in a jar containing cold distilled water. The total rinsing time was ~30 s. Well-dried slides were organized in cassettes and exposed to 3H-Ultrofilm (Fluca) with tritium standards for 3 wk. All age-matched pairs of mutant and control mice were performed simultaneously from tissue preparation to film exposure. The films were then developed in Kodak D-19 developer. The resulting autoradiograms were processed by means of a computerized image system. After the film background was corrected, STX binding density was quantified by Scion Image analysis software.

Immunoblotting

The tissues of cortex and hippocampus from four animals were separately dissected out, weighed, pooled, and transferred to lysis buffer as one sample (4 × vol/wt; 200 mM mannitol, 80 mM HEPES, 41 mM KOH, 1 µM pepstatin A, 1 µM leupeptin, 230 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM ethylenediamine tetrahydrochloride; pH 7.5) for the microsomal preparation according to a method described by Grassl and Aronson (1986). The tissues were then homogenized with a Teflon-glass homogenizer (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000g, 4°C for 10 min to remove cellular debris. The supernatant was re-centrifuged at 100,000g, 4°C in a Beckman SW40T rotor for 1 h. The resulting pellet was re-suspended in 200-500 µl of lysis buffer and protein concentrations were determined using a DC Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, Herculus, CA). Thirty micrograms of membrane protein of each region was resolved on 10% precast NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and electro-transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilin-P, Millipore, Bedford, MA). The affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Na+ channel type I (1:800 dilution), type II (1:600), and type III (1:120) (Sigma) were applied, respectively. Protein signals were detected using an ECL chemiluminescence system (Amersham). For normalization, all the membranes were stripped and re-probed with affinity-purified goat polyclonal antibody to actin at the dilution of 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Four to five pooled samples were studies for each group.

Data analysis

In the electrophysiological experiments, data from the same group were averaged and subjected to one-tailed Student t-test. For STX binding density, all measurements from bilateral areas were averaged as a single value for a given section image. At least two-section images per brain level were analyzed in either mutant or control mice. All values from different sections in a given animal were averaged as one value for a brain region. To compare alterations in STX binding density in various brain regions, changes in STX binding density in mutant mice were converted to percent change based on its control level (100%). Values were subjected to statistical analysis with unpaired t-test. For immunoblotting assay, scanning densitometry of immunoblot films was performed on a Personal Densitometer SI scanner (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and analyzed with the aid of ImageQuaNT image analysis software (Molecular Dynamics). Data were represented as ratios of proteins to the corresponding actins. For values of percentage, data from the age-matched wild-type mice were considered as 100% control. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis. All values in the text were expressed as means ± SE. Differences in means were considered significant if P <=  0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Increased neuronal excitability in hippocampal and cortical neurons

We focused our electrophysiological studies on neurons from the hippocampal CA1 and neocortical neurons and observed major differences in membrane properties and excitability between the mutant and control mice (Fig. 1).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Major difference in rheobase between the mutant and wild-type neurons. A: voltage traces with evoked action potentials in hippocampal CA1 and cortical neurons from the Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) null mutant (mutant) and wild-type brains. B: mean values of rheobase (means ± SE). In the neurons of wild-type CA1, wild-type and mutant cortex, evoked action potentials were collected in the current-clamp mode with 10 depolarizing currents, starting with 10 pA and using 10-pA increments. For mutant CA1 neurons, evoked action potentials were collected with 10 depolarizing currents, starting with 5 pA and using 5-pA increments. Voltage traces start at the bottom and follow upward incrementally. Note that both hippocampal and cortical neurons had a lower rheobase than in wild-type, especially the former, suggesting increased excitability in the mutant neurons.

NEURONAL PROPERTIES AND MEMBRANE EXCITABILITY OF CA1 NEURONS. We used HEPES-containing solutions in this study, with Vm around -40 mV (in bicarbonate solutions, Vm was in the range of -50 mV). We observed that Vm and Rm in hippocampal CA1 neurons of the wild-type were similar to those of the NHE null mutant (Vm was -39 ± 4 mV, n = 14 and -39 ± 2 mV, n = 23; and Rm was 617 ± 301 MOmega , n = 12 and 511 ± 92 MOmega , n = 21 for the wild-type and the mutant, respectively). However, CA1 neurons in the NHE null mutant were much more excitable than wild-type CA1 neurons in spite of the lack of difference in Vm and Rm. The rheobase in the wild-type neurons, for example, was more than double that of the NHE1 mutant neurons (53.3 ± 14.7 pA, n = 14 for the wild-type neurons vs. 23.6 ± 7.6 pA, n = 12 for the NHE null neurons, P = 0.05; Fig. 1).

NEURONAL PROPERTIES AND MEMBRANE EXCITABILITY OF CORTICAL NEURONS. In HEPES solutions, wild-type cortical neurons were more depolarized than NHE1 null mutant neurons (-27 ± 4 mV, n = 9 for wild-type and -38 ± 3 mV, n = 16 for mutant, P = 0.01). Both groups had variable Rm (724 ± 218 MOmega , n = 9 and 1,035 ± 230 MOmega , n = 16 for wild-type and mutant, respectively, P = 0.19). Cortical neurons in the NHE null mutant were, however, as in the CA1 neurons, more excitable than wild-type neurons (Fig. 1). The rheobase in the wild-type neurons was significantly higher than that of NHE1 mutant neurons (55.0 ± 14.4 pA, n = 13 for the wild-type neurons vs. 32.6 ± 5.9 pA, n = 28 for the NHE null neurons, P < 0.05).

Increased Na+ current density in hippocampal and cortical neurons

Because we found major differences in excitability between mutant and wild-type neurons without difference in Vm or Rm, we next investigated whether there is any difference in Na+ current density between the mutant and control mice (Fig. 2).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Major differences in Na+ currents between the mutant and wild-type neurons. A: Na+ current trace in the cortex of the mutant and wild-type mice. B: quantitative changes in peak Na+ currents and Na+ current density (means ± SE). Na+ currents were recorded in voltage clamp. The current density was obtained by normalized peak Na+ currents to whole cell capacitance. Note that Na+ current size and density were higher in the NHE1 null mutant neurons than in wild-type neurons.

MAJOR INCREASE IN NA+ CURRENT DENSITY IN HIPPOCAMPAL CA1 NEURONS. In hippocampal CA1 neurons, the peak Na+ current in the NHE null neurons was much larger compared with that of wild-type neurons (5.3 ± 0.9 nA, n = 23 for the NHE null neurons and 2.7 ± 0.7 nA, n = 15 for the wild type, P = 0.02). Similarly, the current density was also significantly larger in the mutant than wild type (0.65 ± 0.08 nA/pF, n = 23 for the NHE null neurons and 0.44 ± 0.08 nA/pF, n = 14 for the wild-type neurons, P = 0.04).

INCREASED NA+ CURRENT DENSITY IN NEOCORTICAL NEURONS. The peak Na+ current of NHE null cortical neurons was significantly larger, compared with that of wild-type neurons (1.2 ± 0.1 nA, n = 29 for the NHE null neurons and 0.77 ± 0.1 nA, n = 16 for the wild types, P < 0.02). The current density of the NHE null neurons was also significant larger (0.4 ± 0.3 nA/pF, n = 27 for the NHE null neurons and 0.3 ± 0.04 nA/pF, n = 16 for the wild-type neurons, P = 0.04).

Selective upregulation of Na+ channel density in hippocampus and cortex

Because Na+ channel expression is a major factor that determines Na+ current density, we measured the STX binding density to compare Na+ channel expression between the mutant and wild-type mice and found that Na+ channel expression was selectively upregulated in cortical and hippocampal regions (Figs. 3 and 4).



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Selective upregulation of Na+ channel expression in the brain of NHE1 null mutant mice. Age-matched NHE1 null mutant (mutant) and wild-type (control) mice were simultaneously studied with autoradiographic approach. A and B were obtained from different autoradiographic films. In each panel, both images were taken from the same film after the simultaneous performance of saxitoxin (STX) binding and autoradiography. A: forebrain. CA1, hippocampal CA1 field. CA3, hippocampal CA3 field. CPu, caudate putamen. DG, dentate gyrus. FrM, frontoparietal cortex, mortor area. FrS, frontoparietal cortex, somatosensory area. GP, globus pallidus. Me, medial amygdaloid nucleus. Po, posterior thalamic nuclear group. VMH, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. VPM, ventroposterior thalamus nucleus, medial part. Note that the cortical and hippocampal regions had a higher density of Na+ channels in the mutant than in the control, while most thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei had no appreciable increase in the STX binding density. B: cerebellum and brain stem. CBg, cerebellum granular layer. CBm, cerebellum molecular layer. MVe, medial vestibular nucleus. ROb, raphe obscurus nucleus. Sol, nucleus of the solitary tract. Sp5, nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve. Note that Na+ channel density was lower in the cerebellum of the mutant as compared with the control one. Na+ channel density in the medulla of the mutant was similar to that of the control.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Differences in Na+ channel density between mutant and wild-type brain regions. - - -, a control level of STX binding density in age-matched wild-type mice. A: cortical and hippocampal regions. FrPa, frontoparietal cortex; Str, striate cortex. Te, temporal cortex; Ent, entorhinal cortex; CA1 py, hippocampal CA1 field, pyramidal layer; CA1 mol, hippocampal CA1 field, molecular layer; CA3 py, hippocampal CA3 field, pyramidal layer; CA3 mol, hippocampal CA3 field, molecular layer; CA4, hippocampal CA4 field. B: subcortical and caudal regions. CPu, caudate putamen (striatum); GP, globus pallidus; AM, amygdaloid nucleus; VP, ventroposterior thalamic nucleus; Hyp, posterior hypothalamic nucleus; SN, substantia nigra; MG, medial geniculate nucleus; SC, superior colliculus. Data were expressed as means ± SE. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 as compared with wild type. Note that Na+ channel density in most regions of the mutant forebrain increased or tended to increase. In contrast, Na+ channel density in the mutant cerebellum tended to decrease.

NA+ CHANNEL UP-REGULATION IN CORTICAL AND HIPPOCAMPAL REGIONS. STX binding density increased in most cortical regions of NHE1 null mice (Fig. 3A), but the increase was heterogeneous. For example, STX binding density increased by 17% (n = 7, P < 0.05) in the striate cortex and by 11% (n = 7, P < 0.05) in the temporal cortex of NHE1 null mutant mice as compared with that in wild-type. In contrast, other regions such as the frontoparietal cortex and entorhinal cortex of the mutant mice had virtually no increase in STX binding density. In the hippocampus, only the pyramidal cell layer of the CA1 region showed an increase of 12% (n = 7, P < 0.001) in the mutant as compared with control mice (Fig. 3A). The quantitative changes in major cortical and hippocampal regions are shown in Fig. 4A.

It is noteworthy that the upregulation of Na+ channel expression was not consistent with that of Na+ current density (Fig. 5). In CA1 region, for instance, Na+ current density increased by >45% although Na+ channel expression increased by only 11%. In the cortical region, however, Na+ current density increased by ~30% in spite of a larger increase in Na+ channel density (+17%).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Comparison between Na+ channel expression and Na+ current density in mutant hippocampal and cortical neurons. Na+ channel density was assayed with STX binding and autoradiogaphy. Na+ current density was obtained from voltage-clamp recordings with peak currents normalized to whole cell capacitance. Data were expressed as percentage of control level in wild type. *, P < 0.05 and ***, P < 0.001 as compare with wild-type. Note that Na+ channel density increased more in the striate cortex than in the hippocampal CA1 neurons, but Na+ current density increased less in the cortical neurons than in CA1 neurons.

NO MAJOR CHANGE IN STX BINDING DENSITY WITHIN MOST SUBCORTICAL AND OTHER REGIONS. In most subcortical regions, STX binding density had no appreciable change in the NHE1 mutant brains as documented in Figs. 3 and 4B. In the thalamus, STX binding density tended to increase only in the medial part of the ventroposterior thalamic nucleus (VP, 14%), but this change was not statistically significant (P > 0.05, n = 7). In the midbrain, the only region showing an upregulation of Na+ channel expression was the superior colliculus (SC, 13%, n = 7, P < 0.05). Some brain stem nuclei actually exhibited higher STX binding density. For example, raphe obscurus nucleus (ROb) showed a higher level of STX binding density as compared with wild-type (22%, n = 7, P < 0.05; Figs. 3 and 4B). However, no significant increase in STX binding density was found in most brain stem regions. In other brain regions, like the cerebellum, STX binding density tended even to decrease although the change was not statistically significant.

Differential regulation of Na+ channel subtypes in the hippocampus and cortex

Because there are three major neuronal subtypes of Na+ channels in the brain, we further asked which subtype(s) is upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex. To differentiate subtypes I to III, we performed immunoblotting using antibodies against the neuronal isoforms of the Na+ channel and discovered that distinct subtypes of Na+ channels contributed to the Na+ channel upregulation differentially in different regions. Figure 6 shows a significant increase (27%, n = 4, P < 0.05) of subtype II in the cortex and an increase (18%, n = 5, P < 0.05) of subtype I in the hippocampus. In addition, Na+ channel subtype III was expressed at very low level in both cortex and hippocampus and thus no obvious difference was detected between NHE1 null mutants and their wild-type controls. In contrast, other regions, such as cerebellum, tended to decrease both Na+ channel subtypes I and II in the NHE1 mutant as compared with wild type (data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Differential upregulation of Na+ channel subtypes I (A) and II (B) in the mutant hippocampus and cortex. Immunoblotting was employed to compare protein levels of Na+ channel subtypes I and II between NHE1 null mutant (N) and their age-matched wild-type controls (C) in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Top: representative immunoblots of Na+ channel proteins and their corresponding actins. B: densitometric analyses of the protein signals. The x axis showed the different brain regions. The y axis depicts the relative level of Na+ channels, as a ratio of Na+ channel protein to actin density per 30 µg of total membrane protein. Values were means ± SE (n = 5 for subtype I; n = 4 for subtype II). Statistical significance (P < 0.05, mutant vs. wild-type) was indicated (*). Note that Na+ channel subtype I increased in the mutant hippocampus and Na+ channel subtype II increased in the mutant cortex, while actin density was similar in mutant and wild-type.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have made two important observations in this work. First, Na+ channel expression is selectively upregulated in the cortex and hippocampus of the NHE1 mutant mice. Second, the cortical and hippocampal regions, which showed an increased STX binding, also showed an increase in the size of the Na+ current as well as increased membrane excitability. Our data suggest that NHE1 null mutation leads to Na+ channel dysregulation and thus increases neuronal excitability.

A number of factors may alter Na+ channel expression and function (O'Reilly et al. 1997; Urenjak and Obrenovitch 1996; Xia et al. 2000). In this work, we have shown that the whole cell Na+ current is upregulated in the CA1 and neocortex in the NHE1 null mutant mice. This increase in the Na+ current can be a result of increased expression, increased open probability (Po) or increased conductance (i). The STX binding studies that showed increased density in the same regions from which the triturated cells were taken, strongly suggest that the increased whole cell current is at least partly due to the increased expression of Na+ channels. However, this result does not rule out a change in Na+ channel open probability or conductance. As shown in Fig. 5, the increase in whole cell current is larger than the difference in the upregulation of STX binding density in CA1 and neocortical neurons. These data suggest that the increase in Na+ current density is not solely dependent on an increase in Na+ channel number, other factors may also play a role in the increase of Na+ currents in mutant neurons.

There are multiple Na+ channel subtypes in the brain (Caterall 1992; Urenjak and Obrenovitch 1996). Their regulation under various physiological and pathophysiological conditions is not well understood. Our present work shows that Na+ channels I and II are differentially upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex, suggesting that different mechanisms underlie the regional upregulation of Na+ channels in the mutant neurons. Such regionally and differentially regulated Na+ channel isoforms have been described in other pathophysiological conditions such as hypoxia (Zhang et al. 2001) and nerve cell injury (Waxman et al. 1994).

One important and interesting issue is the relation between Na+ channels and NHE1. In this work, we show that, in the absence of NHE1, certain Na+ channel isoforms are upregulated in certain specific cells or regions of the CNS. This raises a number of questions. For instance, we have previously shown that NHE isoform 1 is ubiquitously expressed in the CNS (Ma and Haddad 1997). Hence, one could ask: why is Na+ channel expression upregulated in certain specific regions and not ubiquitously? Another question is whether there is an interaction, physical or indirect, between NHE1 and the Na+ channel. At present, we do not have any evidence suggesting a direct interaction. However, it is possible that the lack of NHE1 leads to alterations in other membrane proteins or intracellular signals that, in turn, alter Na+ channel expression in neurons. This notion of altered Na+ channel expression may not be surprising as the expression of other membrane proteins is also altered in the same NHE1 null mutant mouse (Xue et al. 2002). It would be interesting to speculate that Na+ transport is affected in this null mouse because the Na+ transport-related proteins such as the Na+-HCO3- cotransporter, the Na+-H+ exchanger, and the Na+ channels, are all affected. Based on our work, we would also like to emphasize that the phenotype in a particular gene knock-out animal may not be related directly to that gene but to the effect of other genes that are influenced by the knock-out of that gene.

In summary, we have observed that Na+ channel expression is selectively upregulated in the cortex and hippocampus in NHE1 null mice; this leads to a significant increase in Na+ current density and membrane excitability. Our data suggest that Na+ channel upregulation induces neuronal overexcitability in the cortex and hippocampus, which may form the basis of epileptic seizures in NHE1 null mice. However, we could not rule out the possibility that other membrane proteins also contribute to the pathogenesis of seizure activity in the NHE1 null mutant mice. The molecular mechanisms underlying the Na+ channel upregulation in the mutant need further investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by March of Dimes (FY00-722) and National Institutes of Health Grants to Y. Xia (R01 HD-34852) and to G. G. Haddad (P01 HD-32573 and R01 NS-35918).


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: Y. Xia, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., LMP 3107, New Haven, CT 06520 (E-mail: ying.xia{at}yale.edu).


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


0022-3077/03 $5.00 Copyright © 2003 The American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. Chao, A. Bazzy-Asaad, G. Balboni, S. Salvadori, and Y. Xia
Activation of DOR Attenuates Anoxic K+ Derangement via Inhibition of Na+ Entry in Mouse Cortex
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2217 - 2227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C.-N. Liu and C. J. Somps
Na+/H+ Exchanger-1 Inhibitors Reduce Neuronal Excitability and Alter Na+ Channel Inactivation Properties in Rat Primary Sensory Neurons
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2008; 103(2): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Xue, D. Zhou, H. Yao, O. Gavrialov, M. J. McConnell, B. D. Gelb, and G. G. Haddad
Novel functional interaction between Na+/H+ exchanger 1 and tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2406 - R2416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Luo, H. Chen, D. B. Kintner, G. E. Shull, and D. Sun
Decreased Neuronal Death in Na+/H+ Exchanger Isoform 1-Null Mice after In Vitro and In Vivo Ischemia
J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11256 - 11268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. L. Brett, M. Donowitz, and R. Rao
Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): C223 - C239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
D. Zhou, J. Xue, O. Gavrialov, and G. G. Haddad
Na+/H+ exchanger 1 deficiency alters gene expression in mouse brain
Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2004; 18(3): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/229    most recent
00488.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xia, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xia, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, G. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online