HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/5/2158    most recent 01004.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Buia, C. I. Articles by Tiesinga, P. H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buia, C. I. Articles by Tiesinga, P. H.

Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention

Computational Neurophysics Laboratory, Physics and Astronomy Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Submitted 9 September 2007; accepted in final form 14 February 2008

Receptive fields of neurons in cortical area V4 are large enough to fit multiple stimuli, making V4 the ideal place to study the effects of selective attention at the single-neuron level. Experiments have revealed evidence for stimulus competition and have characterized the effect thereon of spatial and feature-based attention. We developed a biophysical model with spiking neurons and conductance-based synapses. To account for the comprehensive set of experimental results, it was necessary to include in the model, in addition to regular spiking excitatory (E) cells, two types of interneurons: feedforward interneurons (FFI) and top-down interneurons (TDI). Feature-based attention was mediated by a projection of the TDI to the FFI, stimulus competition was mediated by a cross-columnar excitatory connection to the FFI, whereas spatial attention was mediated by an increase in activity of the feedforward inputs from cortical area V2. The model predicts that spatial attention increases the FFI firing rate, whereas feature-based attention decreases the FFI firing rate and increases the TDI firing rate. During strong stimulus competition, the E cells were synchronous in the beta frequency range (15–35 Hz), but with feature-based attention, they became synchronous in the gamma frequency range (35–50 Hz). We propose that the FFI correspond to fast-spiking, parvalbumin-positive basket cells and that the TDI correspond to cells with a double-bouquet morphology that are immunoreactive to calbindin or calretinin. Taken together, the model results provide an experimentally testable hypothesis for the behavior of two interneuron types under attentional modulation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Womelsdorf, K. Anton-Erxleben, and S. Treue Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8934 - 8944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]