JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 1871-1883, 2008. First published February 6, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00032.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/4/1871    most recent
00032.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, S. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, S. L.

Using Complicated, Wide Dynamic Range Driving to Develop Models of Single Neurons in Single Recording Sessions

Kevin H. Hobbs and Scott L. Hooper

Neuroscience Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio

Submitted 10 January 2008; accepted in final form 31 January 2008

Neuron models are typically built by measuring individually, for each membrane conductance, its parameters (e.g., half-maximal voltages) and maximal conductance value (gmax). However, neurons have extended morphologies with nonuniform conductance distributions, whereas models generally contain at most a few compartments. Both the original conductance measurements and the models therefore unavoidably contain error due to the electrical filtering of neurons and the differential placement of conductances on them. Model parameters (typically gmax values) are therefore generally altered by hand or brute force to match model and neuron activity. We propose an alternative method in which complicated, rapidly changing driving input is used to optimize model parameters. This method also ensures that neuron and model dynamics match across a wide dynamic range, a test not performed in most modeling. We tested this concept using leech heartbeat and generic tonically firing models and lobster stomatogastric and generic bursting models as targets and gmax values as optimized parameters. In all four cases optimization solutions excellently matched target activity. Complicated, wide dynamic range driving thus appears to be an excellent method to characterize neuron properties in detail and to build highly accurate models. In these completely defined targets, the method found each target's 8–13 gmax values with high accuracy, and may therefore also provide an alternative, functionally based method of defining neuron gmax values. The method uses only standard experimental and computational techniques, could be easily extended to optimize conductance parameters other than gmax, and should be readily applicable to real neurons.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. L. Hooper, Department of Biological Sciences, Irvine Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 (E-mail: hooper{at}ohio.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.