HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Doiron, B. Articles by Maler, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Doiron, B. Articles by Maler, L.

Interval Coding. II. Dendrite-Dependent Mechanisms

¹Center for Neural Science and ²Courant Institute for Mathematical Science, New York University, New York City, New York; and ³Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and ⁴Center for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 15 September 2006; accepted in final form 5 December 2006

The rich temporal structure of neural spike trains provides multiple dimensions to code dynamic stimuli. Popular examples are spike trains from sensory cells where bursts and isolated spikes can serve distinct coding roles. In contrast to analyses of neural coding, the cellular mechanics of burst mechanisms are typically elucidated from the neural response to static input. Bridging the mechanics of bursting with coding of dynamic stimuli is an important step in establishing theories of neural coding. Electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) pyramidal neurons respond to static inputs with a complex dendrite-dependent burst mechanism. Here we show that in response to dynamic broadband stimuli, these bursts lack some of the electrophysiological characteristics observed in response to static inputs. A simple leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF)-style model with a dendrite-dependent depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) is sufficient to match both the output statistics and coding performance of experimental spike trains. We use this model to investigate a simplification of interval coding where the burst interspike interval (ISI) codes for the scale of a canonical upstroke rather than a multidimensional stimulus feature. Using this stimulus reduction, we compute a quantization of the burst ISIs and the upstroke scale to show that the mutual information rate of the interval code is maximized at a moderate DAP amplitude. The combination of a reduced description of ELL pyramidal cell bursting and a simplification of the interval code increases the generality of ELL burst codes to other sensory modalities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. H. Mehaffey, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner Intrinsic Frequency Tuning in ELL Pyramidal Cells Varies Across Electrosensory Maps J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2641 - 2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. D. Ellis, W. H. Mehaffey, E. Harvey-Girard, R. W. Turner, L. Maler, and R. J. Dunn SK Channels Provide a Novel Mechanism for the Control of Frequency Tuning in Electrosensory Neurons J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9491 - 9502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. Mehaffey, F. R. Fernandez, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner Regulation of Burst Dynamics Improves Differential Encoding of Stimulus Frequency by Spike Train Segregation J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 939 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-M. M. Oswald, B. Doiron, and L. Maler Interval Coding. I. Burst Interspike Intervals as Indicators of Stimulus Intensity J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2731 - 2743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Dimitrov Pings the Body Electric (and Means It Too). Focus on "Interval Coding. I. Burst Interspike Intervals as Indicators of Stimulus Intensity" and "Interval Coding. II. Dendrite-Dependent Mechanisms" J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2577 - 2578. [Full Text] [PDF]