JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 79: 1409-1424, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gribble, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laboissière, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gribble, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laboissière, R.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 3 March 1998, pp. 1409-1424
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Are Complex Control Signals Required for Human Arm Movement?

Paul L. Gribble1, David J. Ostry1, Vittorio Sanguineti2, and Rafael Laboissière3

1 Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada; 2 Department of Informatics, Systems and Telecommunications, University of Genova, Genova, Italy 16145; and 3 Institut de la Communication Parlée, Grenoble, France 38031

Gribble, Paul L., David J. Ostry, Vittorio Sanguineti, and Rafael Laboissière. Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1409-1424, 1998. It has been proposed that the control signals underlying voluntary human arm movement have a "complex" nonmonotonic time-varying form, and a number of empirical findings have been offered in support of this idea. In this paper, we address three such findings using a model of two-joint arm motion based on the lambda  version of the equilibrium-point hypothesis. The model includes six one- and two-joint muscles, reflexes, modeled control signals, muscle properties, and limb dynamics. First, we address the claim that "complex" equilibrium trajectories are required to account for nonmonotonic joint impedance patterns observed during multijoint movement. Using constant-rate shifts in the neurally specified equilibrium of the limb and constant cocontraction commands, we obtain patterns of predicted joint stiffness during simulated multijoint movements that match the nonmonotonic patterns reported empirically. We then use the algorithm proposed by Gomi and Kawato to compute a hypothetical equilibrium trajectory from simulated stiffness, viscosity, and limb kinematics. Like that reported by Gomi and Kawato, the resulting trajectory was nonmonotonic, first leading then lagging the position of the limb. Second, we address the claim that high levels of stiffness are required to generate rapid single-joint movements when simple equilibrium shifts are used. We compare empirical measurements of stiffness during rapid single-joint movements with the predicted stiffness of movements generated using constant-rate equilibrium shifts and constant cocontraction commands. Single-joint movements are simulated at a number of speeds, and the procedure used by Bennett to estimate stiffness is followed. We show that when the magnitude of the cocontraction command is scaled in proportion to movement speed, simulated joint stiffness varies with movement speed in a manner comparable with that reported by Bennett. Third, we address the related claim that nonmonotonic equilibrium shifts are required to generate rapid single-joint movements. Using constant-rate equilibrium shifts and constant cocontraction commands, rapid single-joint movements are simulated in the presence of external torques. We use the procedure reported by Latash and Gottlieb to compute hypothetical equilibrium trajectories from simulated torque and angle measurements during movement. As in Latash and Gottlieb, a nonmonotonic function is obtained even though the control signals used in the simulations are constant-rate changes in the equilibrium position of the limb. Differences between the "simple" equilibrium trajectory proposed in the present paper and those that are derived from the procedures used by Gomi and Kawato and Latash and Gottlieb arise from their use of simplified models of force generation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Ben-Itzhak and A. Karniel
Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements.
Neural Comput., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 779 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Venkadesan and F. J. Valero-Cuevas
Neural Control of Motion-to-Force Transitions with the Fingertip
J. Neurosci., February 6, 2008; 28(6): 1366 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez
Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. Van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert
Equilibrium Point Control Cannot be Refuted by Experimental Reconstruction of Equilibrium Point Trajectories
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1075 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Darainy, F. Towhidkhah, and D. J. Ostry
Control of Hand Impedance Under Static Conditions and During Reaching Movement
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2676 - 2685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry
Neural Averaging in Motor Learning
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 220 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. Van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert
Is Equilibrium Point Control Feasible for Fast Goal-Directed Single-Joint Movements?
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2898 - 2912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. E. Sergio, C. Hamel-Paquet, and J. F. Kalaska
Motor Cortex Neural Correlates of Output Kinematics and Kinetics During Isometric-Force and Arm-Reaching Tasks
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2353 - 2378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Shiller, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry
Voluntary Control of Human Jaw Stiffness
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2207 - 2217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Malfait, P. L. Gribble, and D. J. Ostry
Generalization of Motor Learning Based on Multiple Field Exposures and Local Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3327 - 3338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Pan, M. A. Peshkin, J. E. Colgate, and K. M. Lynch
Static Single-Arm Force Generation With Kinematic Constraints
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2752 - 2765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Darainy, N. Malfait, P. L. Gribble, F. Towhidkhah, and D. J. Ostry
Learning to Control Arm Stiffness Under Static Conditions
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3344 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Debicki and P. L. Gribble
Inter-Joint Coupling Strategy During Adaptation to Novel Viscous Loads in Human Arm Movement
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 754 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. B. Shapiro, G. L. Gottlieb, and D. M. Corcos
EMG Responses to an Unexpected Load in Fast Movements Are Delayed With an Increase in the Expected Movement Time
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2135 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. W. Franklin, R. Osu, E. Burdet, M. Kawato, and T. E. Milner
Adaptation to Stable and Unstable Dynamics Achieved By Combined Impedance Control and Inverse Dynamics Model
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3270 - 3282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. L. Gribble, L. I. Mullin, N. Cothros, and A. Mattar
Role of Cocontraction in Arm Movement Accuracy
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2396 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Shiller, R. Laboissiere, and D. J. Ostry
Relationship Between Jaw Stiffness and Kinematic Variability in Speech
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2329 - 2340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Osu, D. W. Franklin, H. Kato, H. Gomi, K. Domen, T. Yoshioka, and M. Kawato
Short- and Long-Term Changes in Joint Co-Contraction Associated With Motor Learning as Revealed From Surface EMG
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 991 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter
Afferent Roles in Hindlimb Wipe-Reflex Trajectories: Free-Limb Kinematics and Motor Patterns
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1480 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. L. Gribble and D. J. Ostry
Compensation for Interaction Torques During Single- and Multijoint Limb Movement
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2310 - 2326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Nakano, H. Imamizu, R. Osu, Y. Uno, H. Gomi, T. Yoshioka, and M. Kawato
Quantitative Examinations of Internal Representations for Arm Trajectory Planning: Minimum Commanded Torque Change Model
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2140 - 2155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online