JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 79: 1246-1254, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semmler, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semmler, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 3 March 1998, pp. 1246-1254
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Hemispheric Differences in Motor Cortex Excitability During a Simple Index Finger Abduction Task in Humans

John G. Semmler and Michael A. Nordstrom

Department of Physiology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia

Semmler, John G. and Michael A. Nordstrom. Hemispheric differences in motor cortex excitability during a simple index finger abduction task in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1246-1254, 1998.Transcranial magnetic (TMS) and electrical (TES) stimulation was used to assess the contribution of the corticospinal pathway to activation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) in each hand of 16 right-handed subjects. TMS was applied at relaxed threshold intensity while the subject performed isometric index finger abduction at seven force levels [0.5 N to 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)]. In a separate session, TES of equivalent intensity was applied to each hemisphere in 5 of these subjects while they performed the same force-matching protocol. In the resting state, mean threshold intensity for a muscle-evoked potential (MEP) in FDI using TMS was similar for the hemispheres controlling the dominant and nondominant hands. The size of the threshold MEPs in resting FDI after TMS and TES were also similar in each hand. With TMS, contraction-induced facilitation of the MEP in FDI was significantly larger when the nondominant hand was used for index finger abduction. In the pooled data, the nondominant/dominant ratio of MEP areas (normalized to the maximum M wave) ranged from 1.7 in the weakest contraction (0.5 N) to 1.1 in the strongest (50% MVC). Eight subjects had significant differences between hands in favour of the nondominant hand, whereas in two subjects contraction-induced facilitation of MEPs was larger in the dominant hand. In five subjects for whom detailed motor unit data were available from a previous study, lateral differences in MEP facilitation were positively correlated with differences in FDI motor unit synchronization between hands. With TES, contraction-induced facilitation of the MEP was similar in each hand, suggesting that spinal excitability was equivalent on both sides. For the group of five subjects tested with both stimulation techniques, contraction-induced facilitation of the MEP was significantly larger after TMS than that obtained with TES when the contraction was performed with the nondominant hand, but not when the dominant hand was used to perform the task. We conclude that the extent of corticospinal neuron involvement in the command for simple index finger abduction in right-handed subjects is generally greater when the nondominant hand is used, compared with the same task performed with the dominant hand.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Kutch, A. D. Kuo, A. M. Bloch, and W. Z. Rymer
Endpoint Force Fluctuations Reveal Flexible Rather Than Synergistic Patterns of Muscle Cooperation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2455 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. Duque, N. Murase, P. Celnik, F. Hummel, M. Harris-Love, R. Mazzocchio, E. Olivier, and L. G. Cohen
Intermanual Differences in Movement-related Interhemispheric Inhibition.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 204 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. V. Sale and J. G. Semmler
Age-related differences in corticospinal control during functional isometric contractions in left and right hands
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1483 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. L. Pearce, P. D. Thompson, and M. A. Nordstrom
Interhemispheric Coupling of Corticospinal Excitability Is Suppressed During Voluntary Muscle Activation
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2174 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
U. Ziemann, T. V. Ilic, H. Alle, and F. Meintzschel
Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique
Brain, August 1, 2004; 127(8): 1887 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. I. Garry, G. Kamen, and M. A. Nordstrom
Hemispheric Differences in the Relationship Between Corticomotor Excitability Changes Following a Fine-Motor Task and Motor Learning
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1570 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
I. Derakhshan and A. Riestra
Is the middle between both halves? Midpoint location and segment size estimation in neglect
Neurology, April 8, 2003; 60(7): 1221 - 1221.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Hager-Ross and M. H. Schieber
Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2000; 20(22): 8542 - 8550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online