JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 79: 253-269, 1998;
0022-3077/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, T. C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, T. C. T.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 79 No. 1 January 1998, pp. 253-269
Copyright ©1998 The American Physiological Society

Envelope Coding in the Lateral Superior Olive. III. Comparison With Afferent Pathways

Philip X. Joris1, 2 and Tom C. T. Yin2

1 Department of Neurophysiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; and 2 Division of Neurophysiology, Medical School, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

Joris, Philip X. and Tom C. T. Yin. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. III. Comparison with afferent pathways. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 253-269, 1998. Binaural cues for spatial localization of complex high-frequency sounds are interaural level and time differences (ILDs and ITDs). We previously showed that cells in the lateral superior olive (LSO) are sensitive to ITDs in the envelope of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (AM) signals up to a modulation frequency of only ~800 Hz. To understand the limitations in this ITD-sensitivity, we here compare responses to monaural modulation in LSO and its input pathways, derived from cochlear nucleus and medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. These pathways have marked functional and morphological specializations, suggestive of adaptations for timing. Afferent cell populations were identified on the basis of electrophysiological signatures, and for each population, average firing rate and synchronization to AM tones were compared with auditory-nerve fibers and LSO cells. Except for an increase in modulation gain in some subpopulations, synchronization of LSO afferents was very similar to that in auditory nerve fibers in its dependency on sound pressure level (SPL), modulation depth, and modulation frequency. Distributions of cutoff frequencies of modulation transfer functions were largely coextensive with the distribution in auditory nerve. Group delays, measured from the phase of the response modulation as a function of modulation frequency, showed an orderly dependence on characteristic frequency and cell type and little dependence on SPL. Similar responses were obtained to a modulated broadband carrier. Compared with their afferents, LSO cells synchronized to monaurally modulated stimuli with a higher gain but often over a narrower range of modulation frequencies. Considering the scatter in afferent and LSO cell populations, ipsi- and contralateral responses were well matched in cutoff frequency and magnitude of delays. In contrast to their afferents, LSO cells show a decrease in average firing rate at high modulation frequencies. We conclude that the restricted modulation frequency range over which LSO cells show ITD-sensitivity does not result from loss of envelope information along the afferent pathway but is due to convergence or postsynaptic effects at the level of the LSO. The faithful transmission of envelope phase-locking in LSO afferents is consistent with their physiological and morphological adaptations, but these adaptations are not commensurate with the rather small effects of physiological ITDs reported previously, especially when compared with effects of ILDs. We suggest that these adaptations have evolved to allow a comparison of instantaneous amplitude fluctuations at the two ears rather than to extract interaural timing information per se.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Mc Laughlin, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris
How Secure Is In Vivo Synaptic Transmission at the Calyx of Held?
J. Neurosci., October 8, 2008; 28(41): 10206 - 10219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Dreyer and B. Delgutte
Phase Locking of Auditory-Nerve Fibers to the Envelopes of High-Frequency Sounds: Implications for Sound Localization
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2327 - 2341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Siveke, M. Pecka, A. H. Seidl, S. Baudoux, and B. Grothe
Binaural Response Properties of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Gerbil Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Tollin and T. C. T. Yin
Interaural Phase and Level Difference Sensitivity in Low-Frequency Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10648 - 10657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. C. Stecker
Rate-Limited, But Accurate, Central Processing of Interaural Time Differences in Modulated High-Frequency Sounds. Focus on: "Neural Sensitivity to Interaural Envelope Delays in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig"
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3048 - 3049.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Griffin, L. R. Bernstein, N. J. Ingham, and D. McAlpine
Neural Sensitivity to Interaural Envelope Delays in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3463 - 3478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. H. G. Louage, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris
Enhanced Temporal Response Properties of Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Broadband Noise
J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1560 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. H. G. Louage, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris
Temporal Properties of Responses to Broadband Noise in the Auditory Nerve
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2051 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Sterbing, W. R. D'Angelo, E.-M. Ostapoff, and S. Kuwada
Effects of Amplitude Modulation on the Coding of Interaural Time Differences of Low-Frequency Sounds in the Inferior Colliculus. I. Response Properties
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2818 - 2826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Kopp-Scheinpflug, K. Fuchs, W. R. Lippe, B. L. Tempel, and R. Rubsamen
Decreased Temporal Precision of Auditory Signaling in Kcna1-Null Mice: An Electrophysiological Study In Vivo
J. Neurosci., October 8, 2003; 23(27): 9199 - 9207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. X. Joris
Interaural Time Sensitivity Dominated by Cochlea-Induced Envelope Patterns
J. Neurosci., July 16, 2003; 23(15): 6345 - 6350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. J. Tollin
The Lateral Superior Olive: A Functional Role in Sound Source Localization
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 127 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. Macica, C. A. A. von Hehn, L.-Y. Wang, C.-S. Ho, S. Yokoyama, R. H. Joho, and L. K. Kaczmarek
Modulation of the Kv3.1b Potassium Channel Isoform Adjusts the Fidelity of the Firing Pattern of Auditory Neurons
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1133 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D.R.F. Irvine, V. N. Park, and L. McCormick
Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2647 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. L. Snyder, M. Vollmer, C. M. Moore, S. J. Rebscher, P. A. Leake, and R. E. Beitel
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 166 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. S. Krishna and M. N. Semple
Auditory Temporal Processing: Responses to Sinusoidally Amplitude-Modulated Tones in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 255 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Gardner, L. O. Trussell, and D. Oertel
Time Course and Permeation of Synaptic AMPA Receptors in Cochlear Nuclear Neurons Correlate with Input
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1999; 19(20): 8721 - 8729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Kuwada and R. Batra
Coding of Sound Envelopes by Inhibitory Rebound in Neurons of the Superior Olivary Complex in the Unanesthetized Rabbit
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2273 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. X. Joris and P. H. Smith
Temporal and Binaural Properties in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus and Its Output Tract
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1998; 18(23): 10157 - 10170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. Burger and G. D. Pollak
Analysis of the Role of Inhibition in Shaping Responses to Sinusoidally Amplitude-Modulated Signals in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1686 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online