Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 5 3136-3148, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Behavior of eye-movement-related cells in the vestibular nuclei during combined rotational and translational stimuli

K. M. McConville, R. D. Tomlinson and E. Q. NA
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Toronto, Canada.

1. Secondary position-vestibular-pause (PVP) neurons in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) pathway of adult rhesus monkeys were studied during combined semicircular canal and otolith stimulation. The head was rotated at 0.5 Hz with the axis of rotation centered between the otolith organs (on-axis, ON) and with the axis of rotation 23 cm in front of the otoliths (off-axis, OFF). Both conditions were tested with two different vergence angles by the use of 14-cm (near target, NT) and 100-cm (far target, FT) targets. 2. The tangential translational stimulus to the otoliths in the OFF trials should result in a compensatory eye movement that is opposite in direction to that resulting from the angular stimulus to the canals. The otolith stimulus should be great enough to reverse the eye movement response in the NT OFF trials according to geometric calculations. This reversal in eye movement direction occurred as expected although the latency of the reversal (70 ms) was somewhat greater than expected and the magnitude of the reversal was less than predicted solely on the basis of geometric considerations. 3. The responses of the PVP neurons were corrected for eye position sensitivity to investigate the head movement response components. The amplitude of the response in 22 of 24 PVP cells was reduced in the NT OFF condition compared with the FT OFF condition. This difference was not sufficient in itself to explain the observed reversal in eye movement response. 4. The average sensitivities of the neurons to rotation during the FT and NT ON trials were 1.38 and 1.41 spikes.s-1.deg-1.s-1, respectively. This is too small an increase to account for the increase in the angular VOR gain with near targets (approximately 25%); therefore cells other than PVP neurons must be responsible. 5. The average sensitivities of the PVP neurons to translational accelerations obtained from the FT and NT OFF trials were 305 and 484 spikes.s-1.g-1, respectively, which is higher than most otolith afferent sensitivities reported for 0.5-Hz stimuli in the literature. The otolith component is modified by ocular convergence (59% increase in sensitivity), but this increase is too small to account for the change in the translational VOR gain between the two conditions. 6. Although recordings were only obtained from seven eye-head-velocity cells, the results indicate that these neurons may provide the additional signals not present in the PVP cells. These neurons exhibited large differences between ON and OFF rotations and were found to substantially increase their modulation during the NT conditions compared with that observed during the FT conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Zhou, Y. Xu, I. Simpson, and Y. Cai Multiplicative Computation in the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex (VOR) J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2780 - 2789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Semrau, M. Wei, and D. Angelaki Scaling of the Fore-Aft Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex by Eye Position During Smooth Pursuit J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 936 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Meng and D. E. Angelaki Neural Correlates of the Dependence of Compensatory Eye Movements During Translation on Target Distance and Eccentricity J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2530 - 2540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Meng, A. M. Green, J. D. Dickman, and D. E. Angelaki Pursuit--Vestibular Interactions in Brain Stem Neurons During Rotation and Translation J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3418 - 3433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Angelaki Eyes on Target: What Neurons Must do for the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Linear Motion J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 20 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Cullen and J. E. Roy Signal Processing in the Vestibular System During Active Versus Passive Head Movements J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 1919 - 1933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-H. Zhou, M. Wei, and D. E. Angelaki Motor Scaling By Viewing Distance of Early Visual Motion Signals During Smooth Pursuit J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2880 - 2885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Roy and K. E. Cullen Vestibuloocular Reflex Signal Modulation During Voluntary and Passive Head Movements J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2337 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Angelaki, A. M. Green, and J. D. Dickman Differential Sensorimotor Processing of Vestibulo-Ocular Signals during Rotation and Translation J. Neurosci., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 3968 - 3985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Angelaki and J. D. Dickman Spatiotemporal Processing of Linear Acceleration: Primary Afferent and Central Vestibular Neuron Responses J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2113 - 2132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Musallam and R. D. Tomlinson Model for the Translational Vestibuloocular Reflex (VOR) J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 2010 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chen-Huang and R. A. McCrea Effects of Viewing Distance on the Responses of Horizontal Canal-Related Secondary Vestibular Neurons During Angular Head Rotation J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2517 - 2537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chen-Huang and R. A. McCrea Effects of Viewing Distance on the Responses of Vestibular Neurons to Combined Angular and Linear Vestibular Stimulation J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2538 - 2557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Green and H. L. Galiana Hypothesis for Shared Central Processing of Canal and Otolith Signals J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2222 - 2228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]