JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 76: 17-29, 1996;
0022-3077/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parham, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parham, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, D. O.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 1 17-29, Copyright © 1996 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes

K. Parham, H. B. Zhao and D. O. Kim
Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-1110, USA.

1. To elucidate the peripheral contribution to "echo" processing in the auditory system, we examined the characteristics of auditory nerve responses to click-pair stimuli in unanesthetized, decerebrate cats. We used equilevel click pairs at peak levels of 45, 65, and 85 dB SPL re 20 microPa. The interclick intervals ranged from 1 to 32 ms. This study reports results from 78 auditory nerve fibers in 7 cats. The fibers were divided into 2 groups: 33 low- and 45 high-spontaneous rate (SR), with SRs less than and > or = 20 spikes/s, respectively. A method was introduced to quantify the second-click response, and its recovery was examined as a function of the interclick interval. 2. In general, auditory nerve fibers showed a gradual recovery of the second-click response as interclick interval was increased. Noticeable differences in the second-click response recovery functions emerged among fiber populations that were related to the SR. Low-SR fibers showed little change in the recovery functions of the second-click response as the click level was increased from 45 to 85 dB SPL. In contrast, high-SR fibers showed slower recoveries with increasing click level from 45 to 85 dB SPL. At 45 and 65 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the two SR groups were similar. At 85 dB SPL, high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers, regardless of fiber characteristic frequency. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response ranged from 1 to 6 ms (mean, 1.4 ms) among low-SR fibers. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response for high-SR fibers, whereas similar to those for the low-SR fibers at 45 and 65 dB SPL, ranged from 2 to 16 ms (mean, 3 ms) for high-SR fibers, at 85 dB SPL. 3. We also examined auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) evoked by click-pair stimuli for various interclick intervals and click levels. With increasing interclick interval, the amplitude of the second-click CAP increased, and with increasing level, the second-click CAP showed slower recovery. At 45 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the second-click CAP were similar to those of the high- and low-SR fibers. At higher levels, the CAP exhibited lower second-click response values than both high- and low-SR fiber populations for interclick intervals < 4-8 ms. At 85 dB SPL, as interclick interval increased, between 8 and 16 ms, the CAP second-click response converged with that of the high-SR fibers, and by 32 ms, the second-click response values were similar for the CAP, high- and low-SR fibers. 4. The present results are consistent with those of forward masking studies at the level of the auditory nerve in that both demonstrate a short-term reduction of the neural responses. However, the two results differ in that we observed that high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers in response to click-pair stimuli, opposite of the trend observed in the forward masking studies of responses to pure-tone bursts. 5. The present results on auditory nerve fiber responses to click-pair stimuli provide a reference for comparison with responses of central auditory neurons to similar stimuli. This information should serve to elucidate the peripheral contribution to the processing of echoes in the auditory system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Dent, D. J. Tollin, and T. C. T. Yin
Influence of Sound Source Location on the Behavior and Physiology of the Precedence Effect in Cats
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 724 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes
Temporal Nonlinearity During Recovery From Sequential Inhibition by Neurons in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1897 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. J. Tollin, L. C. Populin, and T. C. T. Yin
Neural Correlates of the Precedence Effect in the Inferior Colliculus of Behaving Cats
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3286 - 3297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. J. Tollin and T. C.T. Yin
Psychophysical Investigation of an Auditory Spatial Illusion in Cats: The Precedence Effect
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2149 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Y. Litovsky and B. Delgutte
Neural Correlates of the Precedence Effect in the Inferior Colliculus: Effect of Localization Cues
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 976 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Reale and J. F. Brugge
Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex of the Cat to Successive Sounds Ordered in Time and Space
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 435 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Y. Litovsky and T. C. T. Yin
Physiological Studies of the Precedence Effect in the Inferior Colliculus of the Cat. II. Neural Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1302 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Kuwada, R. Batra, T. C. T. Yin, D. L. Oliver, L. B. Haberly, and T. R. Stanford
Intracellular Recordings in Response to Monaural and Binaural Stimulation of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Cat
J. Neurosci., October 1, 1997; 17(19): 7565 - 7581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online