Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 6 2334-2343, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance

D. A. Winter, F. Prince, J. S. Frank, C. Powell and K. F. Zabjek
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

1. Control of posture in quiet stance has been quantified by center of pressure (COP) changes in the anterior-posterior (A/P) and medial-lateral (M/L) directions from a single force platform. Recording from a single force platform, researchers are unable to recognize two separate mechanisms that become evident when two force platforms are used. Depending on the stance position taken, many combinations of an ankle mechanism and a hip (load/unload) mechanism are evident. In side-by-side stance, A/P balance is totally under ankle (plantar/dorsiflexor) control, whereas M/L balance is under hip (abductor/adductor) control. In tandem stance, the A/P balance is dominated by the hip mechanism, with mixed and small or sometimes negligible contributions by the ankle plantar/dorsiflexors: for M/L balance, the reverse is evident; ankle invertors/evertors dominate, with mixed and small contribution from the hip load/unload mechanism. In an intermediate 45 degrees stance position, both ankle and hip mechanisms contribute to the net balance control in totally different ways. In the M/L direction the two strategies reinforce, whereas in the A/P direction the ankle mechanism must overcome and cancel most of the inappropriate contribution by the hip load/unload mechanism. A spatial plot of the separate mechanisms reveals the fact that the random-looking COP scatter plot is nothing more than a spatial and temporal summation of two separate spatial plots. A straight line joining the individual COPs under each foot is the load/unload line controlled by the hip mechanism. At right angles to this load/unload line in the side-by-side and tandem positions is the independent control line by the ankle muscles. In an intermediate standing position, the separate control lines exist, but now the ankle control is not orthogonal to the load/unload line; rather, it acts at an angle of approximately 60 degrees. The direction of these ankle control and load/unload lines also allows us to pinpoint the muscle groups responsible at the ankle and hip in any of the stance positions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Genthon, P. Rougier, A.-S. Gissot, J. Froger, J. Pelissier, and D. Perennou Contribution of Each Lower Limb to Upright Standing in Stroke Patients Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1793 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Genthon, A.-S. Gissot, J. Froger, P. Rougier, and D. Perennou Posturography in Patients With Stroke: Estimating the Percentage of Body Weight on Each Foot From a Single Force Platform Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 489 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Johannsen, A. M. Wing, and V. Hatzitaki Effects of Maintaining Touch Contact on Predictive and Reactive Balance J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2686 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Levinger, W. L. Gilleard, and K. Sprogis Frontal plane motion of the rearfoot during a one-leg squat in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2006; 96(2): 96 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Mochizuki, T. D. Ivanova, and S. J. Garland Synchronization of Motor Units in Human Soleus Muscle During Standing Postural Tasks J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 62 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Krishnamoorthy and M. L. Latash Reversals of anticipatory postural adjustments during voluntary sway in humans J. Physiol., June 1, 2005; 565(2): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Masani, M. R. Popovic, K. Nakazawa, M. Kouzaki, and D. Nozaki Importance of Body Sway Velocity Information in Controlling Ankle Extensor Activities During Quiet Stance J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3774 - 3782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Henry, J. Fung, and F. B. Horak Effect of Stance Width on Multidirectional Postural Responses J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 559 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Fung and J. M. Macpherson Attributes of Quiet Stance in the Chronic Spinal Cat J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3056 - 3065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Winter, A. E. Patla, F. Prince, M. Ishac, and K. Gielo-Perczak Stiffness Control of Balance in Quiet Standing J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1211 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Wierzbicka, J. C. Gilhodes, and J. P. Roll Vibration-Induced Postural Posteffects J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]