JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 2632-2646, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, B. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 6 2632-2646, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation. I. Functional organization of neurons discriminating between translational and rotational visual flow

D. R. Wylie, T. Kripalani and B. J. Frost
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

1. Extracellular recordings were made from 235 neurons in the vestibulocerebellum (VbC), including the flocculus (lateral VbC), nodulus (folium X), and ventral uvula (ventral folium IXc,d), of the anesthetized pigeon, in response to an optokinetic stimulus. 2. The optokinetic stimuli consisted of two black and white random-dot patterns that were back-projected onto two large tangent screens. The screens were oriented parallel to each other and placed on either side of the bird's head. The resultant stimulus covered the central 100 degrees x 100 degrees of each hemifield. The directional tuning characteristics of each unit were assessed by moving the largefield stimulus in 12 different directions, 30 degrees apart. The directional tuning curves were performed monocularly or binocularly. The binocular directional tuning curves were performed with the direction of motion the same in both eyes (in-phase; e.g., ipsi = upward, contra = upward) or with the direction of motion opposite in either eye (antiphase; e.g., ipsi = upward, contra = downward). 3. Mossy fiber units (n = 17) found throughout folia IXa,b and IXc,d had monocular receptive fields and exhibited direction selectivity in response to stimulation of either the ipsilateral (n = 12) or contralateral (n = 5) eye. None had binocular receptive fields. 4. The complex spike (CS) activity of 218 Purkinje cells in folia IXc,d and X exhibited direction selectivity in response to the large-field visual stimulus moving in one or both visual fields. Ninety-one percent of the cells had binocular receptive fields that could be classified into four groups: descent neurons (n = 112) preferred upward motion in both eyes; ascent neurons (n = 14) preferred downward motion in both eyes; roll neurons (n = 33) preferred upward and downward motion in the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes, respectively; and yaw neurons (n = 40) preferred forward and backward motion in the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes, respectively. Within all groups, most neurons (70%) showed an ipsilateral dominance. 5. For most binocular neurons (91%), the maximum depth of modulation occurred with simultaneous stimulation of both eyes, compared with monocular stimulation of the dominant eye alone. For the translation neurons (descent and ascent), binocular inphase stimulation produced the maximum depth of modulation, whereas for the rotation neurons (roll and yaw), binocular antiphase stimulation produced the maximum depth of modulation. 6. There was a clear functional segregation of the translation and rotation neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Shaikh, F. F. Ghasia, J. D. Dickman, and D. E. Angelaki
Properties of Cerebellar Fastigial Neurons During Translation, Rotation, and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 853 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. A. Crowder, M. R.W. Dawson, and D. R.W. Wylie
Temporal Frequency and Velocity-Like Tuning in the Pigeon Accessory Optic System
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1829 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. R. W. Wylie, R. G. Glover, and J. D. Aitchison
Optic Flow Input to the Hippocampal Formation from the Accessory Optic System
J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5514 - 5527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. R. W. Wylie and B. J. Frost
Complex Spike Activity of Purkinje Cells in the Ventral Uvula and Nodulus of Pigeons in Response to Translational Optic Flow
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 256 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. R. W. Wylie and B. J. Frost
Responses of Neurons in the Nucleus of the Basal Optic Root to Translational and Rotational Flowfields
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online