JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 2533-2549, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawase, T.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawase, T.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, M. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 6 2533-2549, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones

T. Kawase, B. Delgutte and M. C. Liberman
Department of Otolaryngology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

1. The antimasking effects of olivocochlear (OC) efferent feedback were studied in anesthetized or decerebrate cats by comparing responses of single auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) to tone bursts in continuous masking noise seen with and without addition of a moderate-level contralateral noise known to activate the OC reflex. Responses were measured as a function of tone-burst intensity, tone-burst frequency, and masker intensity and were analyzed so as to allow quantitative estimates of the detectability of the tone bursts against the noise background. 2. Addition of the contralateral OC elicitor both increased the maximum discharge rates to the masked tone bursts and decreased the rates to the ipsilateral masker. The rate increases to the tone bursts could be explained on the basis of a decrease in adaptation caused by decreasing the steady response to the masker. The result is a steepening of the rate-versus-level function for masked tone bursts and a concomitant increase in the estimated discriminability of small increments of tone-burst intensity. 3. For tone bursts at the fiber's characteristic frequency (CF), the OC effects on detection threshold for the masked tone bursts depended on masker level, with small increases in threshold for low masker levels and somewhat larger decreases in threshold for higher masker levels. For tone bursts below CF, OC effects, when present, always decreased the detection threshold. 4. The largest antimasking effects were seen for fibers with CFs between 6 and 12 kHz and for masker levels within 20 dB of the fiber's threshold to the masker. These trends appeared to hold for fibers of all spontaneous rates (SRs). 5. Enhancement of the response to unmasked tone bursts and concomitant decrease in the "spontaneous rate" was elicited by OC activation in fibers if threshold sensitivity approached -10 dB SPL. This "enhancement-in-quiet" appears to arise when an animal-generated noise produces a continuous response (in the absence of purposely applied sound) that is suppressed by OC activity. This finding raises questions as to the range of "true" spontaneous rates in the cat. 6. The results highlight two important distinctions between the effects of OC feedback in quiet versus those in noise. In quiet, the effects are predominately suppressive and are restricted to stimuli at frequencies near a fiber's CF and at intensities within its dynamic range. In continuous background noise, the OC reflex can enhance the responses to transient stimuli. Such effects are seen throughout the fiber's response area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and DiagnosticsHome page
J. R. Tanedo and S. P. Bhagat
Attentional Control of Cochlear Micromechanics: The Role of the Medial Olivocochlear Efferent System
Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and Diagnostics, August 1, 2008; 12(1): 17 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. C. M. Wong, A. K. Uppunda, T. B. Parrish, and S. Dhar
Cortical Mechanisms of Speech Perception in Noise
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 1026 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. de Boer and A. R. D. Thornton
Neural Correlates of Perceptual Learning in the Auditory Brainstem: Efferent Activity Predicts and Reflects Improvement at a Speech-in-Noise Discrimination Task
J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 4929 - 4937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. Veuillet, A. Magnan, J. Ecalle, H. Thai-Van, and L. Collet
Auditory processing disorder in children with reading disabilities: effect of audiovisual training
Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 2915 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. Tomchik and Z. Lu
Modulation of Auditory Signal-to-Noise Ratios by Efferent Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3562 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Contextual Modulation of Olivocochlear Pathway Effects on Loud Sound-Induced Cochlear Hearing Desensitization
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1977 - 1988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Groff and M. C. Liberman
Modulation of Cochlear Afferent Response by the Lateral Olivocochlear System: Activation Via Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3178 - 3200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Brown
Response Adaptation of Medial Olivocochlear Neurons Is Minimal
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2381 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Fujino and D. Oertel
Cholinergic Modulation of Stellate Cells in the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7372 - 7383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Unilateral Hearing Losses Alter Loud Sound-Induced Temporary Threshold Shifts and Efferent Effects in the Normal-Hearing Ear
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1257 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Suga, E. Gao, Y. Zhang, X. Ma, and J. F. Olsen
The corticofugal system for hearing: Recent progress
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11807 - 11814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Rajan
Centrifugal Pathways Protect Hearing Sensitivity at the Cochlea in Noisy Environments That Exacerbate the Damage Induced by Loud Sound
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6684 - 6693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
B. J Ceranic, D. K Prasher, E. Raglan, and L. M Luxon
Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1998; 65(4): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Brown, S. G. Kujawa, and M. L. Duca
Single Olivocochlear Neurons in the Guinea Pig. I. Binaural Facilitation of Responses to High-Level Noise
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3077 - 3087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online