Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 5 2010-2023, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles

C. J. De Luca, A. M. Roy and Z. Erim
NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, Massachusetts 02215.

1. Synchronization of concurrently active motor-unit firings was studied in six human muscles performing isometric constant-force contractions at 30% of the maximal level. The myoelectric signal was detected with a quadrifilar needle electrode and was decomposed into its constituent motor-unit action-potential trains with the Precision Decomposition technique, whose accuracy has been proven previously. 2. Synchronization was considered as the tendency of two motor units to fire at fixed time intervals with respect to each other more often than would be expected if the motor units fired independently. A rigorous statistical technique was used to measure the presence of peaks in the cross-interval histogram of pairs of motor-unit action-potential trains. The location of the center of peak as well as their width and amplitude were measured. A synch index was developed to measure the percentage of firings that were synchronized. The percentage of concurrently active motor-unit pairs that contained synchronized firings was measured. 3. Synchronization of motor-unit firings was observed to occur in two modalities. The short-term modality was seen as a peak in the cross-interval histogram centered about zero-time delay (0.5 +/- 2.9 ms, mean +/- SD) and with an average width of 4.5 +/- 2.5 ms. The long-term modality was seen as a peak centered at latencies ranging from 8 to 76 ms. On the average, the peaks of the long-term synchronization were 36% lower but had approximately the same width as the peaks for the short-term synchronization. Short-term synchronization was seen in 60% of the motor-unit paris, whereas long-term synchronization was seen in 10% of the pairs. 4. Short-term synchronization occurred in bursts of consecutive firings, ranging in number from 1 to 10, with 91% of all synchronized firing occurring in groups of 1 or 2; and the bursts of discharges appeared at sporadic times during the contraction. 5. The amount of synchronization in motor-unit pairs was found to be low. In the six muscles that were tested, an average of 8.0% of all the firings were short-term synchronized, and an average of 1.0% were long-term synchronized. The synch index was statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.07-0.89) among the different muscles and among 9 of the 11 subjects tested. 6. Sixty percent of concurrently active motor-unit pairs displayed short-term synchronization, 10% of the pairs displayed long-term synchronization, and 8% displayed both modalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Kutch, A. D. Kuo, A. M. Bloch, and W. Z. Rymer Endpoint Force Fluctuations Reveal Flexible Rather Than Synergistic Patterns of Muscle Cooperation J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2455 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Farina, C. Cescon, F. Negro, and R. M. Enoka Amplitude Cancellation of Motor-Unit Action Potentials in the Surface Electromyogram Can Be Estimated With Spike-Triggered Averaging J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Zhou and W. Z. Rymer Factors Governing the Form of the Relation Between Muscle Force and the EMG: A Simulation Study J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2878 - 2886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Keen and A. J. Fuglevand Common Input to Motor Neurons Innervating the Same and Different Compartments of the Human Extensor Digitorum Muscle J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. S. Turker and R. K. Powers Effects of Common Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs on Motoneuron Synchronization J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2807 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Day and M. Hulliger Experimental Simulation of Cat Electromyogram: Evidence for Algebraic Summation of Motor-Unit Action-Potential Trains J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2144 - 2158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Gandevia Spinal and Supraspinal Factors in Human Muscle Fatigue Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1725 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Roeleveld, B. G. M. van Engelen, and D. F. Stegeman Possible mechanisms of muscle cramp from temporal and spatial surface EMG characteristics J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2000; 88(5): 1698 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]