JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 1827-1840, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 5 1827-1840, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Computer simulations of the effects of different synaptic input systems on motor unit recruitment

C. J. Heckman and M. D. Binder
Veterans Administration, Chicago, Illinois.

1. The effects of four different synaptic input systems on the recruitment order within a mammalian motoneuron pool were investigated using computer simulations. The synaptic inputs and motor unit properties in the model were based as closely as possible on the available experimental data for the cat medial gastrocnemius pool and muscle. Monte Carlo techniques were employed to add random variance to the motor unit thresholds and forces and to sample the resulting recruitment orders. 2. The effects of the synaptic inputs on recruitment order depended on how they modified the range of recruitment thresholds established by differences in the intrinsic current thresholds of the motoneurons. Application of a uniform synaptic input to the pool (i.e., distributed equally to all motoneurons) resulted in a recruitment sequence that was quite stable even with the addition of large amounts of random variance. With 50% added random variance, the recruitment reversals did not exceed 8%. 3. The simulated monosynaptic input from homonymous Ia afferent fibers generated a twofold expansion of the range of recruitment thresholds beyond that attributed to the differences in the intrinsic current thresholds. The Ia input generated a small reduction in the number of recruitment reversals due to random variance (6% reversals at 50% random variance). The simulated monosynaptic vestibulospinal input generated a twofold compression of the range of recruitment thresholds that exerted a modest increase in the number of recruitment reversals (12% reversals at 50% random variance). 4. In comparison with the modest effects of the two monosynaptic inputs, the simulated oligosynpatic rubrospinal excitatory input exerted a nine-fold compression in the recruitment threshold range that resulted in a recruitment sequence that was highly sensitive to random variance. With 50% added random variance, the sequence became nearly random (40% reversals). 5. Reciprocal Ia inhibition was simulated by a uniform distribution within the pool, but its effects on recruitment order were highly dependent on the distribution of the excitatory input. Reciprocal inhibition exerted only minor effects on recruitment order when combined with the Ia or vestibulospinal inputs. However, when the excitatory drive was supplied by the rubrospinal input, even small amounts of reciprocal inhibition were sufficient to completely reverse the normal recruitment sequence. 6. The simulated monosynaptic Ia input was highly effective in compensating for the disruptive effects of rubrospinal excitation on recruitment order. Even a small Ia bias combined with the rubrospinal excitation was sufficient to halve the effects of random variance and to restore the normal recruitment sequence in the presence of rather large amounts of reciprocal inhibition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
C.J. Heckman, M. Johnson, C. Mottram, and J. Schuster
Persistent Inward Currents in Spinal Motoneurons and Their Influence on Human Motoneuron Firing Patterns
Neuroscientist, June 1, 2008; 14(3): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. G. Martin, N. Weerakkody, S. C. Gandevia, and J. L. Taylor
Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans
J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1277 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. J Kuo, T Siddique, R Fu, and C. J Heckman
Increased persistent Na+ current and its effect on excitability in motoneurones cultured from mutant SOD1 mice
J. Physiol., March 15, 2005; 563(3): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. Gonzalez-Forero, F. Portillo, C. R. Sunico, and B. Moreno-Lopez
Nerve injury reduces responses of hypoglossal motoneurones to baseline and chemoreceptor-modulated inspiratory drive in the adult rat
J. Physiol., June 15, 2004; 557(3): 991 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Pastor and D. Gonzalez-Forero
Recruitment Order of Cat Abducens Motoneurons and Internuclear Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2240 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. H. Lee, J. J. Kuo, M. C. Jiang, and C. J. Heckman
Influence of Active Dendritic Currents on Input-Output Processing in Spinal Motoneurons In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 27 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. K. Haftel, J. F. Prather, C. J. Heckman, and T. C. Cope
Recruitment of Cat Motoneurons in the Absence of Homonymous Afferent Feedback
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 616 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. J. Sokoloff, S. G. Siegel, and T. C. Cope
Recruitment Order Among Motoneurons From Different Motor Nuclei
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2485 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. D. Binder, F. R. Robinson, and R. K. Powers
Distribution of Effective Synaptic Currents in Cat Triceps Surae Motoneurons. VI. Contralateral Pyramidal Tract
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 241 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. C. Cope, A. J. Sokoloff, S. M. Dacko, R. Huot, and E. Feingold
Stability of Motor-Unit Force Thresholds in the Decerebrate Cat
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3077 - 3082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Dean
Simulated Recruitment of Medial Rectus Motoneurons by Abducens Internuclear Neurons: Synaptic Specificity vs. Intrinsic Motoneuron Properties
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1997; 78(3): 1531 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online