JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 462-473, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 2 462-473, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Focal selectivity for binaural sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: two-way intensity network tuning

M. N. Semple and L. M. Kitzes
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine 92717.

1. The influence of sound pressure level (SPL) at the two ears was studied in single-neuron responses recorded in high-frequency regions of primary auditory cortex (AI) of anesthetized cats. For each unit, many binaural combinations of SPL were tested by using best-frequency tone pips presented to each ear independently via sealed stimulus delivery systems. In the preceding paper, we illustrated the different forms of response observed in our sample of units. Here we explore in more detail the mechanisms underlying the properties of the largest single class of binaural response, characterized by joint nonmonotonic tuning to the SPLs at the two ears. We have described such units as being influenced by a Two-Way Intensity Network (TWIN). 2. Under binaural conditions, 62% of our sample of well documented neurons (81/130) exhibited a nonmonotonic relation between response magnitude and the SPL at one or the other ear. Of these units, 47 displayed clear bilateral nonmonotonicity (TWIN tuning), 17 units displayed only unilateral nonmonotonicity, and an additional 17 units showed intermediate (or transitional) characteristics between unilateral and bilateral nonmonotonicity. These characteristics can also be described in terms of average binaural level (ABL) and interaural level difference (ILD). Thus there is commonly a nonmonotonic relation between response magnitude and ABL and sometimes a TWIN tuning to ABL and ILD. The distribution of best frequencies for TWIN neurons is broad. 3. Under monaural conditions, TWIN neurons exhibit diverse properties. Some are responsive only under binaural conditions [i.e., predominantly binaural (PB)]. Some monaurally responsive TWINs are contralaterally excitable and ipsilaterally unresponsive (EO), some are ipsilaterally excitable and contralaterally unresponsive (OE), and a few are bilaterally excitable (EE). Monaural rate/level functions are monotonic for some of these neurons and nonmonotonic for others. Neurons of the PB class have previously been found to have nonmonotonic selectivity for ILDs near zero. In this study we have found that virtually all PB neurons are also nonmonotonically selective for ABL with different PB neurons having different best ABLs. 4. For TWIN neurons that respond monaurally, it is possible to demonstrate a mixed binaural influence. The optimal stimulus (or best binaural combination) for a TWIN neuron is associated with binaural facilitation. Flanking the most effective combination of ABL and ILD are less effective combinations that generate lower response magnitudes, either through threshold effects (at low SPLs) or through binaural suppression (at higher SPLs).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Nelken, J. K. Bizley, F. R. Nodal, B. Ahmed, A. J. King, and J. W. H. Schnupp
Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1928 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple
Dynamic Amplitude Coding in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rhesus Macaques
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1451 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. A. Campbell, J. W. H. Schnupp, A. Shial, and A. J. King
Binaural-Level Functions in Ferret Auditory Cortex: Evidence for a Continuous Distribution of Response Properties
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3742 - 3755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Moshitch, L. Las, N. Ulanovsky, O. Bar-Yosef, and I. Nelken
Responses of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex (A1) to Pure Tones in the Halothane-Anesthetized Cat
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3756 - 3769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes
Temporal Nonlinearity During Recovery From Sequential Inhibition by Neurons in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1897 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes
Modulation of Level Response Areas and Stimulus Selectivity of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2263 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Park, A. Klug, M. Holinstat, and B. Grothe
Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Lateral Superior Olive and the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 289 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes
Binaural Interaction Revisited in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 101 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Nakamoto, J. Zhang, and L. M. Kitzes
Response Patterns Along an Isofrequency Contour in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex (AI) to Stimuli Varying in Average and Interaural Levels
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 118 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Sutter and W. C. Loftus
Excitatory and Inhibitory Intensity Tuning in Auditory Cortex: Evidence for Multiple Inhibitory Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2629 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Reale, R. L. Jenison, and J. F. Brugge
Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1024 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Ojima and K. Murakami
Intracellular Characterization of Suppressive Responses in Supragranular Pyramidal Neurons of Cat Primary Auditory Cortex In Vivo
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2002; 12(10): 1079 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone, D. C. Guard, M. L. Phan, and T.-I K. Su
Correlation Between the Activity of Single Auditory Cortical Neurons and Sound-Localization Behavior in the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2723 - 2739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Oswald, A. Klug, and T. J. Park
Interaural Intensity Difference Processing in Auditory Midbrain Neurons: Effects of a Transient Early Inhibitory Input
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 1149 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Eggermont
Azimuth Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat. II. Relative Latency and Interspike Interval Representation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2151 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. C. deCharms, D. T. Blake, and M. M. Merzenich
Optimizing Sound Features for Cortical Neurons
Science, May 29, 1998; 280(5368): 1439 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Heil
Auditory Cortical Onset Responses Revisited. II. Response Strength
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2642 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online