JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 1978-1992, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Widener, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Widener, G.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 6 1978-1992, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects on wrist and digit muscle activity from microstimuli applied at the sites of rubromotoneuronal cells in primates

P. D. Cheney, K. Mewes and G. Widener
Department of Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

1. The purpose of this study was to use the techniques of spike- and stimulus-triggered averaging (SpTA and StTA, respectively) to examine the output organization of individual rubromotoneuronal (RM) cells in relation to clusters of neighboring cells. SpTA of electromyographic (EMG) activity in awake monkeys reveals the target muscles of an individual recorded neuron, whereas StTA reveals the target muscles of the neuronal aggregate activated by the stimulus. 2. Three questions were of particular interest. First, does the pattern of poststimulus facilitation (PStF) across forearm muscles match the pattern of postspike facilitation (PSpF)? Second, does the output of RM cell aggregates tested with StTA favor forearm extensor muscles, as reported for individual RM cells in the companion paper? Third, how do RM poststimulus effects compare with corticomotoneuronal (CM) poststimulus effects? 3. Microstimuli were applied at the sites of 37 RM cells, identified by SpTA of EMG activity in awake monkeys performing an alternating wrist movement task. 4. The magnitudes of PStF at 5, 10, and 20 microA were, respectively, 4.3, 10.1, and 13.7 times greater than PSpF of the same muscles, reflecting activation, by the stimulus, of multiple RM cells. RM cell PStF was weaker than CM PStF. 5. The onset latency of poststimulus suppression (PStS) exceeded that of PStF. For example, at 20 microA the difference was 2.6 ms, comparable with the difference between PSpF and postspike suppression (PSpS). 6. The patterns of poststimulus effects on forearm flexor and extensor muscles were categorized in the same manner as postspike effects. Three major patterns were observed: 1) pure facilitation, 2) reciprocal suppression, and 3) cofacilitation of extensors and flexors. 7. The profile of PStF across synergist muscles was broadly similar to that of PSpF. At 83% of sites, the muscle with the greatest PSpF was also the muscle with the greatest PStF. At 30% of sites (11 of 37), the set of muscles with PStF (muscle field) exactly matched the set with PSpF. Overall, the level of discrepancies in SpTAs versus StTAs computed at the same RM cell sites was 27%. Most of these discrepancies could be attributed to muscles with the weakest effects. 8. The fact that the poststimulus muscle fields at many RM cell sites matched the postspike fields at the same sites, even though the poststimulus effects were greater in magnitude and were mediated by more cells, suggests clustering of RM cells with similar target motoneuron pools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Soteropoulos and S. N. Baker
Bilateral representation in the deep cerebellar nuclei
J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 1117 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Davidson and J. A. Buford
Motor Outputs From the Primate Reticular Formation to Shoulder Muscles as Revealed by Stimulus-Triggered Averaging
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 83 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Lavoie and T. Drew
Discharge Characteristics of Neurons in the Red Nucleus During Voluntary Gait Modifications: A Comparison with the Motor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1791 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Horn, M. Pong, S. R. Batni, S. M. Levy, and A. R. Gibson
Functional Specialization Within the Cat Red Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 469 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Belhaj-Saif and P. D. Cheney
Plasticity in the Distribution of the Red Nucleus Output to Forearm Muscles After Unilateral Lesions of the Pyramidal Tract
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3147 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M.-J. Rho, S. Lavoie, and T. Drew
Effects of Red Nucleus Microstimulation on the Locomotor Pattern and Timing in the Intact Cat: A Comparison With the Motor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2297 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. McKiernan, J. K. Marcario, J. H. Karrer, and P. D. Cheney
Corticomotoneuronal Postspike Effects in Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Digit, and Intrinsic Hand Muscles During a Reach and Prehension Task
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1961 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Belhaj-Saif, J. H. Karrer, and P. D. Cheney
Distribution and Characteristics of Poststimulus Effects in Proximal and Distal Forelimb Muscles From Red Nucleus in the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1777 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online