Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 5 1785-1804, Copyright © 1991 by APS

ARTICLES

Synaptic plasticity in visual cortex: comparison of theory with experiment

E. E. Clothiaux, M. F. Bear and L. N. Cooper
Physics Department, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.

1. The aim of this work was to assess whether a form of synaptic modification based on the theory of Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM) can, with a fixed set of parameters, reproduce both the kinetics and equilibrium states of experience-dependent modifications cortex. 2. According to the BCM theory, the connection strength of excitatory geniculocortical synapses varies as the product of a measure of input activity (d) and a function (phi) of the summed postsynaptic response. For all postsynaptic responses greater than spontaneous but less than a critical value called the "modification threshold" (theta), phi has a negative value. For all postsynaptic responses greater than theta, phi has a positive value. A novel feature of the BCM theory is that the value of theta is not fixed, but rather "slides" as a nonlinear function of the average postsynaptic response. 3. This theory permits precise specification of theoretical equivalents of experimental situations, allowing detailed, quantitative comparisons of theory with experiment. Such comparisons were carried out here in a series of computer simulations. 4. Simulations are performed by presenting input to a model cortical neuron, calculating the summed postsynaptic response, and then changing the synaptic weights according to the BCM theory. This process is repeated until the synaptic weights reach an equilibrium state. 5. Two types of geniculocortical input are simulated: "pattern" and "noise." Pattern input is assumed to correspond to the type of input that arises when a visual contour of a particular orientation is presented to the retina. This type of input is said to be "correlated" when the two sets of geniculocortical fibers relaying information from the two eyes convey the same patterns at the same time. Noise input is assumed to correspond to the type of input that arises in the absence of visual contours and, by definition, is uncorrelated. 6. By varying the types of input available to the two sets of geniculocortical synapses, we simulate the following types of visual experience: 1) normal binocular contour vision, 2) monocular deprivation, 3) reverse suture, 4) strabismus, 5) binocular deprivation, and 6) normal contour vision after a period of monocular deprivation. 7. The constraints placed on the set of parameters by each type of simulated visual environment, and the effects that such constraints have on the evolution of the synaptic weights, are investigated in detail.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. D. Faulkner, V. Vorobyov, and F. Sengpiel Limited Protection of the Primary Visual Cortex from the Effects of Monocular Deprivation by Strabismus Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1822 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Mitchell, G. Gingras, and P. C. Kind Initial recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens is faster when both eyes are open PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11662 - 11667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Lee, B. Blais, H. Z. Shouval, and L. N Cooper Statistics of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) activity determine the segregation of ON/OFF subfields for simple cells in visual cortex PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12875 - 12879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Blais, H. Z. Shouval, and L. N. Cooper The role of presynaptic activity in monocular deprivation: Comparison of homosynaptic and heterosynaptic mechanisms PNAS, February 2, 1999; 96(3): 1083 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Hickmott and M. Constantine-Paton Experimental Down-Regulation of the NMDA Channel Associated With Synapse Pruning J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1096 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Harsanyi and M. J. Friedlander Transient Synaptic Potentiation in the Visual Cortex. I. Cellular Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1269 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Harsanyi and M. J. Friedlander Transient Synaptic Potentiation in the Visual Cortex. II. Developmental Regulation J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1284 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Bear A synaptic basis for memory storage in the cerebral cortex PNAS, November 26, 1996; 93(24): 13453 - 13459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Benuskova, V. Rema, M. Armstrong-James, and F. F. Ebner Theory for normal and impaired experience-dependent plasticity in neocortex of adult rats PNAS, February 27, 2001; 98(5): 2797 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Abraham, S. E. Mason-Parker, M. F. Bear, S. Webb, and W. P. Tate Heterosynaptic metaplasticity in the hippocampus in vivo: A BCM-like modifiable threshold for LTP PNAS, September 11, 2001; 98(19): 10924 - 10929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]