JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 1769-1784, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marlin, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cynader, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marlin, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cynader, M. S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 5 1769-1784, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Position-specific adaptation in simple cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex

S. G. Marlin, R. M. Douglas and M. S. Cynader
Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

1. Responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex were studied with flashed light-slit stimuli. The responses to bars flashed in different positions in the receptive field were assessed quantitatively before and after periods of prolonged stimulation of one small region. This type of prolonged stimulation resulted in reduced responsivity over a limited zone within the simple cell receptive field. 2. The adaptation-induced responsivity decrement was generally confined to the receptive-field subregion that was adapted (either ON or OFF). Prolonged stimulation within an ON region did not usually result in adaptation effects that spread into neighboring OFF regions. Furthermore, the adaptation-induced response decrement did not necessarily spread throughout the subregion in which the adapting stimulus was presented. The adaptation effects from prolonged stimulation at a single receptive-field position spread throughout the subregion in nearly one-half of the 25 cells examined for position-specific adaptation. Another subpopulation of neurons (n = 12) displayed adaptation effects that spread through only one-half of the subregion, whereas in two neurons the spread of the adaptation effect was even more restricted and encompassed only one-fourth of the subregion. 3. The spread of adaptation was not systematically related to the size of the stimulus presented, the size of the receptive field, or the magnitude of the adaptation-induced response decrements but was significantly correlated with the spatial wavelength of the cell (the reciprocal of the cell's preferred spatial frequency) and with the size of the subregion in which the adapting stimulus was presented. Cells with large receptive-field subregions and long wave-lengths showed adaptation effects that spread further than those of cells with small subregions. 4. The adaptation effects from repeated stimulation at a single receptive-field position did not spread symmetrically across the receptive field, and the preferred direction of motion for a given cell indicated the direction of the asymmetric spread of the adaptation. Receptive-field positions that would be stimulated by a light slit originating at the point of adaptation and moving in the preferred direction (preferred side) showed greater adaptation-induced response decrements than did receptive-field positions that would be stimulated by a light slit moving in the opposite direction from the point of adaptation (nonpreferred side). There was significant enhancement of responses at some receptive-field positions on the nonpreferred side of the point of adaptation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Mayo and M. A. Sommer
Neuronal Adaptation Caused by Sequential Visual Stimulation in the Frontal Eye Field
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1923 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Kohn
Visual Adaptation: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Functional Benefits
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3155 - 3164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Heitwerth, R. Kern, J. H. van Hateren, and M. Egelhaaf
Motion Adaptation Leads to Parsimonious Encoding of Natural Optic Flow by Blowfly Motion Vision System
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1761 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. M. Truchard, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Contrast Gain Control in the Visual Cortex: Monocular Versus Binocular Mechanisms
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 3017 - 3032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. S. Chance, S. B. Nelson, and L. F. Abbott
Synaptic Depression and the Temporal Response Characteristics of V1 Cells
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1998; 18(12): 4785 - 4799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Varela, K. Sen, J. Gibson, J. Fost, L. F. Abbott, and S. B. Nelson
A Quantitative Description of Short-Term Plasticity at Excitatory Synapses in Layer 2/3 of Rat Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1997; 17(20): 7926 - 7940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online