Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 4 1272-1279, Copyright © 1991 by APS

ARTICLES

Properties of high-threshold mechanoreceptors in the oral mucosa. I. Responses to dynamic and static pressure

B. Cooper, M. Ahlquist, R. M. Friedman, B. Loughner and M. Heft
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Gainesville 32610.

1. Mechanical response properties of high-threshold mechanoreceptors (HTMs) of the goat oral mucosa were determined by single-unit recording from the palatine and alveolar nerves and from the trigeminal ganglion. The following observations were made. 2. HTMs of the oral mucosa could be separated into two subgroups on the basis of their threshold to mechanical stimulation. Intense pressure receptors (IPRs) comprised a group of A-delta afferents with thresholds of 2-16 g. Mechanonociceptors (MNs) comprised a group of relatively slowly conducting afferents (A-delta and C-fibers) with a higher threshold range (16-300 g). 3. In most instances, MNs lacked pressure-transducing capacity. Tests of reactivity to dynamically or statically applied stimuli revealed that significant functions were rarely fit between MN activity and pressure (4/20 cases). 4. IPRs differed from MNs by their pressure-transducing properties. The afferent response interval was in inverse proportion to the applied pressure. Significant pressure interval functions were fit in 16/20 cases. The relationship between pressure and response interval was best described by power functions. 5. Tests of reactivity to dynamically or statically applied stimuli revealed that IPRs preferred static pressure. Tighter fits and steeper slopes were observed in power functions fit to data generated by statically applied stimuli (mean fitted function, dynamic test: LnISI = -0.97 LnP + 3.4; mean fitted function, static test: LnISI = -1.6 LnP + 4.71). 6. Pressures-frequency thresholds (PFTs), asymptotes (PFAs), and mean response intervals (MRIs) were determined for IPRs from the static test series. The first two values are the pressures that produce the lower and upper limits of response frequency of mucosal HTMs (mean PFT, 1.48 N/mm2; mean PFA, 3.34 N/mm2). The MRI (28 ms) is simply computed from the function. When PFTs and PFAs are combined with activation threshold and power functions, they provide a relatively complete description of the range and form of reactivity of the IPR of the oral mucosa.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Strassman and D. Levy Response Properties of Dural Nociceptors in Relation to Headache J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1298 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Levy and A. M. Strassman Mechanical Response Properties of A and C Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating the Rat Intracranial Dura J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3021 - 3031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Craig, K. Krout, and D. Andrew Quantitative Response Characteristics of Thermoreceptive and Nociceptive Lamina I Spinothalamic Neurons in the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1459 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Petruska, J. Napaporn, R. D. Johnson, J. G. Gu, and B. Y. Cooper Subclassified Acutely Dissociated Cells of Rat DRG: Histochemistry and Patterns of Capsaicin-, Proton-, and ATP-Activated Currents J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2365 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Slugg, R. A. Meyer, and J. N. Campbell Response of Cutaneous A- and C-Fiber Nociceptors in the Monkey to Controlled-Force Stimuli J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2179 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Khalsa, R. H. Lamotte, and P. Grigg Tensile and Compressive Responses of Nociceptors in Rat Hairy Skin J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 492 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lee and G.K. Essick Spatial and Gender-dependent Variations in Perioral Pinprick Sensitivity Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 1993; 72(8): 1206 - 1214. [PDF]