JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 919-938, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drew, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drew, T.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 3 919-938, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Functional organization within the medullary reticular formation of the intact unanesthetized cat. III. Microstimulation during locomotion

T. Drew
Departement de Physiologie, Faculte de Medecine, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

1. This article presents the results from stimulation in 21 loci within the medullary reticular formation (MRF; between 0.5 and 2.5 mm from the midline) and in 5 loci in the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) of four intact, unanesthetized cats during locomotion. Stimulus trains (11 pulses, 0.2-ms duration, 330 Hz, stimulus strength 35 microA) were applied at those loci in each track at which the most widespread effects in each of the four limbs were obtained with the cat at rest. Electromyograms were recorded from flexor and extensor muscles of each limb. 2. As previously reported, stimulation with the cat at rest generally evoked brief, short-latency, twitch responses in both flexor and extensor muscles of more than one limb. In contrast, stimulation during locomotion evoked a more complex pattern of activity in which responses were normally evoked in one or other of the muscle pairs and incorporated into the locomotor pattern. 3. In the majority of sites, the stimulation evoked excitatory responses in the flexor muscles of each of the four limbs during that period of the step cycle in which each respective muscle was naturally active; stimulation in the stance phase of locomotion, although less effective, was also capable of producing responses in these muscles. All three ipsilateral extensor muscles studied [long and lateral heads of triceps and vastus lateralis (Tri, TriL, and VL, respectively)] were normally inhibited during their phase of muscle activity, although excitatory responses were occasionally seen. Responses in the contralateral (co) Tri were invariably excitatory and were largest during the period of muscle activity, whereas responses during the period of activity of the coVL were mixed, with both excitatory and inhibitory responses being seen from any one locus. 4. Excitatory responses were normally largest when stimulation was applied during the time that the muscle was active during the locomotor cycle. Responses evoked at times when the muscle was inactive were sometimes larger than those evoked with the animal at rest; such responses were most commonly seen in the hindlimb flexors and in the coVL. 5. In both flexors and extensors of each of the four limbs, the latency of the responses was greatest when the cat was at rest and least for stimuli given during the period of activity of the respective muscle. Average latencies during the period of muscle activity ranged from a minimum of 9.0 +/- 2.6 (SD) ms for inhibitory responses in the ipsilateral Tri and TriL to a maximum of 17.1 +/- 3.0 ms for the responses evoked in the ipsilateral semitendinosus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Schepens, P. Stapley, and T. Drew
Neurons in the Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Signal Posture and Movement Both as an Integrated Behavior and Independently
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2235 - 2253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. Jankowska and K. Stecina
Uncrossed actions of feline corticospinal tract neurones on lumbar interneurones evoked via ipsilaterally descending pathways
J. Physiol., April 1, 2007; 580(1): 133 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Schepens and T. Drew
Descending Signals From the Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Are Bilateral, Asymmetric, and Gated During Reaching Movements in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2229 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
E. Jankowska and S. A. Edgley
How Can Corticospinal Tract Neurons Contribute to Ipsilateral Movements? A Question With Implications for Recovery of Motor Functions
Neuroscientist, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 67 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Bretzner and T. Drew
Contribution of the Motor Cortex to the Structure and the Timing of Hindlimb Locomotion in the Cat: A Microstimulation Study
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 657 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Schepens and T. Drew
Independent and Convergent Signals From the Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Contribute to the Control of Posture and Movement During Reaching in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2217 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Davidson and J. A. Buford
Motor Outputs From the Primate Reticular Formation to Shoulder Muscles as Revealed by Stimulus-Triggered Averaging
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 83 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Brocard and R. Dubuc
Differential Contribution of Reticulospinal Cells to the Control of Locomotion Induced By the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1714 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. V. Zelenin, S. Grillner, G. N. Orlovsky, and T. G. Deliagina
Heterogeneity of the Population of Command Neurons in the Lamprey
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7793 - 7803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. D. Prentice and T. Drew
Contributions of the Reticulospinal System to the Postural Adjustments Occurring During Voluntary Gait Modifications
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 679 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Matsuyama and T. Drew
Vestibulospinal and Reticulospinal Neuronal Activity During Locomotion in the Intact Cat. II. Walking on an Inclined Plane
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2257 - 2276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P.H.J.A. Nieuwenhuijzen, A. M. Schillings, G. P. Van Galen, and J. Duysens
Modulation of the Startle Response During Human Gait
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 65 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Duysens, F. Clarac, and H. Cruse
Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 83 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M.-J. Rho, S. Lavoie, and T. Drew
Effects of Red Nucleus Microstimulation on the Locomotor Pattern and Timing in the Intact Cat: A Comparison With the Motor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2297 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Brustein and S. Rossignol
Recovery of Locomotion After Ventral and Ventrolateral Spinal Lesions in the Cat. I. Deficits and Adaptive Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1245 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Wannier, T. G. Deliagina, G. N. Orlovsky, and S. Grillner
Differential Effects of the Reticulospinal System on Locomotion in Lamprey
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online