Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 53-63, Copyright © 1991 by APS

ARTICLES

Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. I. Recordings in the monkey Macaca fascicularis

G. McCarthy, C. C. Wood and T. Allison
Neuropsychology Laboratory, Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut 06516.

1. The anatomic generators of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation in the 10- to 30-ms latency range were investigated in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) by means of cortical-surface and laminar recordings. 2. Three groups of SEPs evoked by stimulation of the contralateral median nerve were recorded from the hand representation area of sensorimotor cortex: P10-N20, recorded anterior to the central sulcus (CS); N10-P20, recorded posterior to the CS; and P12-N25, recorded near the CS. These potentials were similar in morphology and surface distribution whether the animal was awake or anesthetized. 3. P10-N20 exhibited a polarity inversion to N10-P20 across the CS, both in cortical-surface recordings and in laminar recordings within cortex and white matter of motor and somatosensory cortex. In contrast, P10-N20 and N10-P20 did not exhibit polarity inversion in recordings from the surface and white matter of the crowns of motor and somatosensory cortex, respectively. These results strongly suggest that these potentials are produced by a tangential generator located in the posterior wall of the CS, primarily in area 3b of somatosensory cortex. 4. P12-N25 was largest over the hand area of somatosensory cortex and showed polarity inversion across the crown of somatosensory cortex but not across the crown of motor cortex or across the walls of the CS, suggesting that P12-N25 is due to a radially oriented generator located in areas 1 and 2 of somatosensory cortex. 5. P10-N20 and P12-N25 are thought to be equivalent to the "primary evoked response" recorded from somatosensory cortex of other mammals. 6. These results are very similar to those obtained in human cortical-surface recordings and demonstrate that the monkey P10-N20, N10-P20, and P12-N25 potentials correspond to the human P20-N30, N20-P30, and P25-N35 potentials, respectively. The only appreciable difference in human and monkey SEPs is that the monkey P12-N25 appears to be generated in areas 1 and 2, whereas the human P25-N35 appears to be generated only in area 1. 7. There was no evidence of locally generated activity in areas 3a and 4.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kalisch, P. Ragert, P. Schwenkreis, H. R. Dinse, and M. Tegenthoff Impaired Tactile Acuity in Old Age Is Accompanied by Enlarged Hand Representations in Somatosensory Cortex Cereb Cortex, November 13, 2008; (2008) bhn190v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jackson, S. N. Baker, and E. E. Fetz Tests for presynaptic modulation of corticospinal terminals from peripheral afferents and pyramidal tract in the macaque J. Physiol., May 15, 2006; 573(1): 107 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Inui, X. Wang, Y. Tamura, Y. Kaneoke, and R. Kakigi Serial Processing in the Human Somatosensory System Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2004; 14(8): 851 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]