|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 4 1247-1260, Copyright © 1990 by APS
ARTICLES |
R. A. Reale and J. F. Brugge
Department of Neurophysiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53705.
1. The interaural-phase-difference (IPD) sensitivity of single neurons in the primary auditory (AI) cortex of the anesthetized cat was studied at stimulus frequencies ranging from 120 to 2,500 Hz. Best frequencies of the 43 AI cells sensitive to IPD ranged from 190 to 2,400 Hz. 2. A static IPD was produced when a pair of low-frequency tone bursts, differing from one another only in starting phase, were presented dichotically. The resulting IPD-sensitivity curves, which plot the number of discharges evoked by the binaural signal as a function of IPD, were deeply modulated circular functions. IPD functions were analyzed for their mean vector length (r) and mean interaural phase (phi). Phase sensitivity was relatively independent of best frequency (BF) but highly dependent on stimulus frequency. Regardless of BF or stimulus frequency within the excitatory response area the majority of cells fired maximally when the ipsilateral tone lagged the contralateral signal and fired least when this interaural-phase relationship was reversed. 3. Sensitivity to continuously changing IPD was studied by delivering to the two ears 3-s tones that differed slightly in frequency, resulting in a binaural beat. Approximately 26% of the cells that showed a sensitivity to static changes in IPD also showed a sensitivity to dynamically changing IPD created by this binaural tonal combination. The discharges were highly periodic and tightly synchronized to a particular phase of the binaural beat cycle. High synchrony can be attributed to the fact that cortical neurons typically respond to an excitatory stimulus with but a single spike that is often precisely timed to stimulus onset. A period histogram, binned on the binaural beat frequency (fb), produced an equivalent IPD-sensitivity function for dynamically changing interaural phase. For neurons sensitive to both static and continuously changing interaural phase there was good correspondence between their static (phi s) and dynamic (phi d) mean interaural phases. 4. All cells responding to a dynamically changing stimulus exhibited a linear relationship between mean interaural phase and beat frequency. Most cells responded equally well to binaural beats regardless of the initial direction of phase change. For a fixed duration stimulus, and at relatively low fb, the number of spikes evoked increased with increasing fb, reflecting the increasing number of effective stimulus cycles. At higher fb, AI neurons were unable to follow the rate at which the most effective phase repeated itself during the 3 s of stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. von Kriegstein, T. D. Griffiths, S. K. Thompson, and D. McAlpine Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2712 - 2718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Draganova, B. Ross, A. Wollbrink, and C. Pantev Cortical Steady-State Responses to Central and Peripheral Auditory Beats Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1193 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karino, M. Yumoto, K. Itoh, A. Uno, K. Yamakawa, S. Sekimoto, and K. Kaga Neuromagnetic Responses to Binaural Beat in Human Cerebral Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1927 - 1938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuwada, D. C. Fitzpatrick, R. Batra, and E.-M. Ostapoff Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus of the Unanesthetized Rabbit: Comparison With Other Structures J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1309 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. X. Joris, B. van de Sande, A. Recio-Spinoso, and M. van der Heijden Auditory Midbrain and Nerve Responses to Sinusoidal Variations in Interaural Correlation J. Neurosci., January 4, 2006; 26(1): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ojima, M. Takayanagi, D. Potapov, and R. Homma Isofrequency Band-like Zones of Activation Revealed by Optical Imaging of Intrinsic Signals in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1497 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Borisyuk, M. N. Semple, and J. Rinzel Adaptation and Inhibition Underlie Responses to Time-Varying Interaural Phase Cues in a Model of Inferior Colliculus Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 2134 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Batra and D. C. Fitzpatrick Processing of Interaural Temporal Disparities in the Medial Division of the Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 666 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple Context-Dependent Adaptive Coding of Interaural Phase Disparity in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques J. Neurosci., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 4625 - 4638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. McAlpine, D. Jiang, T. M. Shackleton, and A. R. Palmer Responses of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus to Dynamic Interaural Phase Cues: Evidence for a Mechanism of Binaural Adaptation J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1356 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, and R. Batra Neural Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences: Beyond the Jeffress Model J. Neurosci., February 15, 2000; 20(4): 1605 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Spitzer and M. N. Semple Transformation of Binaural Response Properties in the Ascending Auditory Pathway: Influence of Time-Varying Interaural Phase Disparity J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3062 - 3076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. Theunissen and A. J. Doupe Temporal and Spectral Sensitivity of Complex Auditory Neurons in the Nucleus HVc of Male Zebra Finches J. Neurosci., May 15, 1998; 18(10): 3786 - 3802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Sanes, B. J. Malone, and M. N. Semple Role of Synaptic Inhibition in Processing of Dynamic Binaural Level Stimuli J. Neurosci., January 15, 1998; 18(2): 794 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Brugge, R. A. Reale, and J. E. Hind The Structure of Spatial Receptive Fields of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat J. Neurosci., July 15, 1996; 16(14): 4420 - 4437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Spitzer and M. Semple Interaural phase coding in auditory midbrain: influence of dynamic stimulus features Science, November 1, 1991; 254(5032): 721 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |