JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 64: 1170-1185, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A. R.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 4 1170-1185, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Inhibition of sensory responses of cat inferior olive neurons produced by stimulation of red nucleus

C. Weiss, J. C. Houk and A. R. Gibson
Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

1. The sensory responsiveness of cells in the inferior olive is known to be suppressed during certain phases of active movement. These experiments were designed to test the possibility that activity in the rubrospinal pathway contributes to this suppression. We recorded from cells sensitive to light touch located in one of the divisions of the inferior olive, the rostral dorsal accessory olive (rDAO), in cats anesthetized with pentobarbitol sodium. Responsiveness to peripheral stimuli was tested during and after trains of conditioning stimuli delivered to the rubrospinal pathway. 2. All 44 cells in our sample of rDAO neurons showed an inhibition of responsiveness to peripheral stimuli after conditioning stimulation of the rubrospinal pathway. Typical conditioning trains consisted of 0.2-ms pulses at 200 Hz for 100 ms. The mean current required for a reduction in firing probability to 0.5 was 31 microA. Slight increases in intensity often completely inhibited responses to peripheral stimuli. 3. Inhibition of responsiveness showed a delayed time course. Peak inhibition occurred approximately 50 ms after the last pulse in the conditioning train. In many cases there was no demonstrable inhibition during the conditioning train. Increases of train frequency, train duration, or stimulus intensity produced stronger and broader periods of olivary inhibition. 4. The lowest threshold points for eliciting rDAO inhibition coincided with either the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) or the rubrospinal tract (RST). Stimulation at RST sites produced inhibition of responses in the contralateral but not in the ipsilateral rDAO. Transection of the RST in the upper brain stem blocked the inhibition produced by red-nucleus stimulation without altering the inhibition produced by tract stimulation caudal to the transection. The inhibitory effects thus appear to be caused by activation of the rubrospinal pathway. 5. The inhibitory timing observed in this study may be appropriate for explaining the suppression of olivary responsiveness to contact that has been observed in awake animals. Bursts of movement-related, red nucleus discharge often cease approximately 50 ms before the end of movement. This timing would allow peak inhibition to develop at approximately the time of contact with an object at the end of a goal-directed limb movement.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Robleto and R. F. Thompson
Extinction of a Classically Conditioned Response: Red Nucleus and Interpositus
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2651 - 2658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Ackerley, J. Pardoe, and R. Apps
A novel site of synaptic relay for climbing fibre pathways relaying signals from the motor cortex to the cerebellar cortical C1 zone
J. Physiol., October 15, 2006; 576(2): 503 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Pardoe, S. A. Edgley, T. Drew, and R. Apps
Changes in Excitability of Ascending and Descending Inputs to Cerebellar Climbing Fibers during Locomotion
J. Neurosci., March 17, 2004; 24(11): 2656 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. E. Brown and J. M. Bower
The Influence of Somatosensory Cortex on Climbing Fiber Responses in the Lateral Hemispheres of the Rat Cerebellum after Peripheral Tactile Stimulation
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2002; 22(15): 6819 - 6829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Horn, T. M. Hamm, and A. R. Gibson
Red Nucleus Stimulation Inhibits Within the Inferior Olive
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3127 - 3136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online