|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 1 206-224, Copyright © 1990 by APS
ARTICLES |
A. B. Saul and A. L. Humphrey
Department of Neurobiology, Anatomy, and Cell Science, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 15261.
1. It has recently been shown that the X- and Y-cell classes in the A-layers of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are divisible into lagged and nonlagged types. We have characterized the visual response properties of 153 cells in the A-layers to 1) reveal response features that are relevant to the X/Y and lagged/nonlagged classification schemes, and 2) provide a systematic description of the properties of lagged and nonlagged cells as a basis for understanding mechanisms that affect these two groups. Responses to flashing spots and drifting gratings were measured as the contrast and spatial and temporal modulation were varied. 2. X- and Y-cells were readily distinguished by their spatial tuning. Y-cells had much lower preferred spatial frequencies and spatial resolution than X-cells. Within each functional class (X or Y), however, lagged and nonlagged cells were similar in their spatial response properties. Thus the lagged/nonlagged distinction is not one related to the spatial domain. 3. In the temporal domain X- and Y-cells showed little difference in temporal tuning, whereas lagged and nonlagged cells showed distinctive response properties. The temporal tuning functions of lagged cells were slightly shifted toward lower frequencies with optimal temporal frequencies of lagged X-cells averaging an octave lower than those of nonlagged X-cells. Temporal resolution was much lower in lagged X- and Y-cells than in their nonlagged counterparts. 4. The most dramatic differences between lagged and nonlagged cells appeared in the timing of their responses, as measured by the phase of the response relative to the sinusoidal luminance modulation of a spot centered in the receptive field. Response phase varied approximately linearly with temporal frequency. The slope of the phase versus frequency line is a measure of total integration time, which we refer to as visual latency. Lagged cells has much longer latencies than nonlagged cells. 5. The intercept of the phase versus frequency line is a measure of when in the stimulus cycle the cell responds: we refer to this as the intrinsic or absolute phase of the cell. This measure of response timing not only distinguished lagged and nonlagged cells well but also covaried with the sustained or transient nature of cells' responses to flashed stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Luo, Y. Wang, D. Poeppel, and J. Z. Simon Concurrent Encoding of Frequency and Amplitude Modulation in Human Auditory Cortex: Encoding Transition J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3473 - 3485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Kumbhani, M. J. Nolt, and L. A. Palmer Precision, Reliability, and Information-Theoretic Analysis of Visual Thalamocortical Neurons J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2647 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Nolt, R. D. Kumbhani, and L. A. Palmer Suppression at High Spatial Frequencies in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1167 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Z. Simon, D. A. Depireux, D. J. Klein, J. B. Fritz, and S. A. Shamma Temporal symmetry in primary auditory cortex: implications for cortical connectivity. Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 583 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Hietanen, N. A. Crowder, and M. R. Ibbotson Contrast Gain Control Is Drift-Rate Dependent: An Informational Analysis J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1078 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sengpiel, K.-U. Jirmann, V. Vorobyov, and U. T. Eysel Strabismic Suppression Is Mediated by Inhibitory Interactions in the Primary Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1750 - 1758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, J. K. Thompson, T. Duong, M. R. Peterson, and R. D. Freeman Origins of Cross-Orientation Suppression in the Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1755 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Teich and N. Qian Comparison Among Some Models of Orientation Selectivity J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 404 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Huang and M. A. Paradiso Background Changes Delay Information Represented in Macaque V1 Neurons J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4314 - 4330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10844 - 10856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, M. R. Peterson, J. K. Thompson, T. Duong, and R. D. Freeman Cross-Orientation Suppression: Monoptic and Dichoptic Mechanisms Are Different J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1645 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sengpiel and V. Vorobyov Intracortical Origins of Interocular Suppression in the Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6394 - 6400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B Saul, P. L Carras, and A. L Humphrey Temporal Properties of Inputs to Direction-Selective Neurons in Monkey V1 J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 282 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weng, C.-I Yeh, C. R. Stoelzel, and J.-M. Alonso Receptive Field Size and Response Latency Are Correlated Within the Cat Visual Thalamus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3537 - 3547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Alitto, T. G. Weyand, and W. M. Usrey Distinct Properties of Stimulus-Evoked Bursts in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Lesica and G. B. Stanley Encoding of Natural Scene Movies by Tonic and Burst Spikes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., November 24, 2004; 24(47): 10731 - 10740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Nolt, R. D. Kumbhani, and L. A. Palmer Contrast-Dependent Spatial Summation in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Retina of the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1708 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Vajda, M. J.M. Lankheet, B. G. Borghuis, and W. A. van de Grind Dynamics of Directional Selectivity in Area 18 and PMLS of the Cat Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2004; 14(7): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Alitto and W. M. Usrey Influence of Contrast on Orientation and Temporal Frequency Tuning in Ferret Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2797 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Peterson, B. Li, and R. D. Freeman The Derivation of Direction Selectivity in the Striate Cortex J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3583 - 3591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Z. Lauritzen and K. D. Miller Different Roles for Simple-Cell and Complex-Cell Inhibition in V1 J. Neurosci., November 12, 2003; 23(32): 10201 - 10213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carandini, D. J Heeger, and W. Senn A Synaptic Explanation of Suppression in Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., November 15, 2002; 22(22): 10053 - 10065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Priebe, M. M. Churchland, and S. G. Lisberger Constraints on the Source of Short-Term Motion Adaptation in Macaque Area MT. I. The Role of Input and Intrinsic Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 354 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Troyer, A. E. Krukowski, and K. D. Miller LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2741 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Bair, J. R. Cavanaugh, M. A. Smith, and J. A. Movshon The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons J. Neurosci., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 3189 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Saul and J. C. Feidler Development of Response Timing and Direction Selectivity in Cat Visual Thalamus and Cortex J. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2945 - 2955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Alonso, W. M. Usrey, and R. C. Reid Rules of Connectivity between Geniculate Cells and Simple Cells in Cat Primary Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 4002 - 4015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kayser, N. J. Priebe, and K. D. Miller Contrast-Dependent Nonlinearities Arise Locally in a Model of Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 2130 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Priebe, M. M. Churchland, and S. G. Lisberger Reconstruction of Target Speed for the Guidance of Pursuit Eye Movements J. Neurosci., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3196 - 3206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Depireux, J. Z. Simon, D. J. Klein, and S. A. Shamma Spectro-Temporal Response Field Characterization With Dynamic Ripples in Ferret Primary Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1220 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Hillenbrand and J. L. van Hemmen Does Corticothalamic Feedback Control Cortical Velocity Tuning? Neural Comput., February 1, 2001; 13(2): 327 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Usrey, J. B. Reppas, and R. C. Reid Specificity and Strength of Retinogeniculate Connections J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3527 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Murthy and A. L. Humphrey Inhibitory Contributions to Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure and Direction Selectivity in Simple Cells of Cat Area 17 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 1212 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Mareschal and C. L. Baker Jr. Temporal and Spatial Response to Second-Order Stimuli in Cat Area 18 J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 2811 - 2823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Humphrey and A. B. Saul Strobe Rearing Reduces Direction Selectivity in Area 17 by Altering Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 2991 - 3004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Humphrey, A. B. Saul, and J. C. Feidler Strobe Rearing Prevents the Convergence of Inputs With Different Response Timings Onto Area 17 Simple Cells J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3005 - 3020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Erwin and K. D. Miller Correlation-Based Development of Ocularly Matched Orientation and Ocular Dominance Maps: Determination of Required Input Activities J. Neurosci., December 1, 1998; 18(23): 9870 - 9895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cai, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman Spatiotemporal Receptive Field Organization in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cats and Kittens J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1045 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Dan, J. J. Atick, and R. C. Reid Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory J. Neurosci., May 15, 1996; 16(10): 3351 - 3362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Douglas, C Koch, M Mahowald, K. Martin, and H. Suarez Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits Science, August 18, 1995; 269(5226): 981 - 985. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |