JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 63: 1098-1108, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darling, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darling, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 63, Issue 5 1098-1108, Copyright © 1990 by APS

ARTICLES

Muscle activation patterns and kinetics of human index finger movements

W. G. Darling and K. J. Cole
Department of Exercise Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

1. The present study was conducted to determine whether dynamic interaction torques are significant for control of digit movements and to investigate whether such torques are compensated by specific muscle activation patterns. 2. Angular positions of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the index finger in the flexion/extension plane were recorded with the use of planar electrogoniometers. Muscle activation patterns were monitored with the use of fine wire and surface electromyography of intrinsic and extrinsic finger muscles. 3. Dynamic interaction torques associated with index finger movements were large in relation to joint torques produced by muscles, especially in faster movements. The significance of dynamic interaction torques was demonstrated in model simulations of two-joint finger motion in response to joint torque inputs. Removal of interaction torques from the model inputs produced movements that differed greatly from digit motions produced by human subjects. 4. Electromyogram (EMG) and torque patterns associated with finger movements of different speeds indicated that muscle activity is necessary not only for producing motion at the joints but also to counteract segmental interaction torques. This was especially evident during movements that required voluntary maintenance of a constant MP joint angle during motion of the distal segment about the PIP joint. Under these conditions, muscle moments acting at the MP acted directly to counteract torques at the MP arising from motion at the PIP. 5. Neural mechanisms underlying control of index finger movement are discussed with reference to the implications of dynamic interaction torques. Potential control strategies include accurate programming of muscle activation patterns, appropriate use of motion-dependent peripheral afferent information, and control of the finger as a viscoelastic system through coactivation of flexor and extensor musculature. It is concluded that additional research incorporating study of motion in three dimensions and the use of mechanical models of the finger and related musculature is required to determine how interaction torques are compensated during finger motion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. V. Grinyagin, E. V. Biryukova, and M. A. Maier
Kinematic and Dynamic Synergies of Human Precision-Grip Movements
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2284 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Brochier, R. L. Spinks, M. A. Umilta, and R. N. Lemon
Patterns of Muscle Activity Underlying Object-Specific Grasp by the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1770 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online