JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 62: 1039-1051, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lia, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lia, B.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 5 1039-1051, Copyright © 1989 by APS

ARTICLES

Response properties in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the adult cat after interruption of prenatal binocular interactions

C. A. White, L. M. Chalupa, L. Maffei, M. A. Kirby and B. Lia
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616.

1. Single-cell recordings were made in the magnocellular layer of the dorsal lateral genicule nucleus (dLGN) of five adult cats in which prenatal binocular interactions were interrupted by monocular enucleation at known gestational ages. Three cats (early enucleates) had one eye removed on either embryonic day 44.48, or 49, before retinogeniculate inputs are segregated into uniocular layers. Two other (late enucleates) underwent this procedure on embryonic days 55 and 58, when segregation is well advanced. Responses were compared with those obtained from recordings in the A and A1 layers of the dLGN of seven normal adult cats. 2. Cells were classified as ON or OFF by the use of spots of light and as X or Y based on a test of linearity of spatial summation with the use of counterphased sinusoidal gratings. Receptive-field size and spatial resolution were also obtained. 3. The dLGN of prenatally enucleated cats contains a dorsal magnocellular layer and a ventral parvocellular layer. In early enucleates, only an occasional hint of a cell-sparse interlaminar zone was apparent, located between the magnocellular and parvocellular layers. In late enucleates, a prominent cell-sparse band was observed contralateral to the remaining eye, in a region that would most likely correspond to layer A1 in the normal dLGN. No such cell-sparse band was seen ipsilateral to the remaining eye in late enucleates. 4. Eighty-six X cells and 22 Y cells were studied in the enucleates. Both cell types were found at all depths of the magnocellular layer. All but a few neurons had concentric ON-center or OFF-center receptive fields that were normal in size. The topography of receptive fields also appeared normal. In addition, spatial resolution of X and Y cells was similar in experimental and control animals. 5. In early enucleates there was a higher percentage of X cells and a lower percentage of Y cells than normal. The change in X-to-Y ratio was shown to be because of both a gain in cells with X properties and a loss of cells with Y properties. The distribution of dLGN somal sizes in the early enucleates was comparable with controls, so the change in X-to-Y ratio most likely did not result from an electrode sampling bias. It was suggested that the X-to-Y ratio difference could stem from the abnormalities in retinogeniculate terminal arbors that have been shown to follow early eye removal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online