JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 62: 864-881, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witkovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Tranchina, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Witkovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Tranchina, D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 4 864-881, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Photoreceptor to horizontal cell synaptic transfer in the Xenopus retina: modulation by dopamine ligands and a circuit model for interactions of rod and cone inputs

P. Witkovsky, S. Stone and D. Tranchina
Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016.

1. In the Xenopus retina, the effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine ligands on photoreceptor to horizontal cell transfer were studied by intracellular recording from horizontal cell axons. Rod and cone inputs to the horizontal cell were estimated by adjusting the intensities of red and green flashes to elicit equal rod tails. The resultant waveforms were digitized and subtracted, and their difference was taken to reflect solely cone input to the horizontal cell. 2. It was found that both D1 (SKF 38393) and D2 (LY 171555) agonists increased the amplitude and quickened the kinetics of cone-to-horizontal cell transfer; they also depolarized the horizontal cell by 8-10 mV. In contrast, either D1 or D2 agonists reduced the rod input to the horizontal cell without altering its kinetics. 3. Type D2 antagonists reduced and slowed the cone input and hyperpolarized the horizontal cell. D2 antagonists increased the rod input but left its kinetics unchanged. 4. Although both D1 and D2 agonists elicited qualitatively similar effects, the D1 agonist evoked a greater increase in the amplitude and a greater acceleration of the kinetics of the cone input than did the D2 agonist. Moreover, the action of the D1 agonist was blocked by SCH 23390 but not by spiroperidol or metoclopramide, whereas the reverse was true for the D2 agonist. These data indicate that D1 and D2 agonists probably act at different sites. 5. The pharmacologic findings are interpreted to indicate that dopamine ligands act primarily through the cone pathway and that rod-to-horizontal cell transfer is shunted to a variable degree. 6. An equivalent circuit model was developed for a spine-bearing portion of a horizontal cell axon of the Xenopus retina. Anatomic study shows that such spines branch, making contact with both rod and cone photoreceptor bases. Thus there are two conductance pathways in parallel for rod-to-horizontal cell and cone-to-horizontal cell transmission. The model is used to test the hypothesis that mutual shunting in the two pathways can account for the physiological effects observed. 7. The values of the purely resistive elements of the pathway are based on their dimensions. Membrane resistance was taken to be 5,000 omega/cm2 and axial resistance 200 omega/cm. The photoreceptor-to-horizontal cell synaptic battery was taken to be composed of glutamate-sensitive channels, with unitary channel conductance of 6 pS. Channel density was estimated from freeze-fracture data at 5,000 microns-2. A potassium battery and a glycine-sensitive synaptic input from an interplexiform cell were modeled to exist in parallel with the light-sensitive battery. 8. Dopamine was assumed to increase the conductance of the cone-to-horizontal cell synapse, but not to affect the conductance of the rod-to-to-horizontal cell synapse, consistent with physiological measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. E. Kourennyi, X.-d. Liu, J. Hart, F. Mahmud, W. H. Baldridge, and S. Barnes
Reciprocal Modulation of Calcium Dynamics at Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Synapses by Nitric Oxide
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. B. Thoreson, E. J. Bryson, and K. Rabl
Reciprocal Interactions Between Calcium and Chloride in Rod Photoreceptors
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1747 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Nir, J. M. Harrison, R. Haque, M. J. Low, D. K. Grandy, M. Rubinstein, and P. M. Iuvone
Dysfunctional Light-Evoked Regulation of cAMP in Photoreceptors and Abnormal Retinal Adaptation in Mice Lacking Dopamine D4 Receptors
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2063 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Witkovsky, Y. Schmitz, A. Akopian, D. Krizaj, and D. Tranchina
Gain of Rod to Horizontal Cell Synaptic Transfer: Relation to Glutamate Release and a Dihydropyridine-Sensitive Calcium Current
J. Neurosci., October 1, 1997; 17(19): 7297 - 7306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online