Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 1 30-45, Copyright © 1988 by APS

ARTICLES

Compartmentalization of motor units in the cat neck muscle, biventer cervicis

J. B. Armstrong, P. K. Rose, S. Vanner, G. J. Bakker and F. J. Richmond
Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

1. The neck muscle biventer cervicis is supplied by five separate nerve bundles that originate from segments C2-C5 and enter the muscle at different rostrocaudal levels. We have used the glycogen-depletion method to investigate the distribution of muscle fibers supplied by each nerve bundle and also the extent of motor-unit territories supplied by single motoneurons in the C3 segment. 2. Prolonged intermittent stimulation of each nerve bundle produced glycogen depletion in a compartment of muscle fibers that ran only a fraction of the whole-muscle length. The depleted compartment was separated by tendinous inscriptions from adjacent, serially arranged compartments that were supplied by different nerve bundles. Thus the muscle was divided into five in-series compartments, arranged in the same rostrocaudal sequence as the nerves by which they were supplied. 3. Six fast, glycolytic (FG) and five fast, oxidative-glycolytic (FOG) motor units were depleted by repetitive intracellular stimulation of their antidromically identified motoneurons in the C3 segment. The fibers of each motor unit were confined to a striplike subvolume whose cross-sectional area was only 20-40% of that for the whole compartment in which it was located. Single motor units contained an average of 408 extrafusal fibers (range: 262-582 fibers), and these were distributed with an average density of 20 fibers/mm2 in cross sections through their motor domains. No significant differences were found between the numbers or densities of fibers in FG and FOG motor units. 4. The specialized in-series organization of compartments has functional implications because the forces generated by one compartment of motor units must be transmitted through other in-series compartments of muscle fibers rather than directly onto skeletal attachments. The confined distribution of muscle fibers belonging to a single motor unit suggests that an additional level of organization may exist within individual compartments. The implications of these features for the physiological behavior and neural control of biventer cervicis are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Farina, F. Negro, M. Gazzoni, and R. M. Enoka Detecting the Unique Representation of Motor-Unit Action Potentials in the Surface Electromyogram J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1223 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Farina, C. Cescon, F. Negro, and R. M. Enoka Amplitude Cancellation of Motor-Unit Action Potentials in the Surface Electromyogram Can Be Estimated With Spike-Triggered Averaging J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Keenan and F. J. Valero-Cuevas Experimentally Valid Predictions of Muscle Force and EMG in Models of Motor-Unit Function Are Most Sensitive to Neural Properties J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1581 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Keenan, D. Farina, F. G. Meyer, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka Sensitivity of the cross-correlaton between simulated surface EMGs for two muscles to detect motor unit synchronization J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1193 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Keenan, D. Farina, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 1928 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Damon and J. C. Gore Physiological basis of muscle functional MRI: predictions using a computer model J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 264 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Keen and A. J. Fuglevand Distribution of Motor Unit Force in Human Extensor Digitorum Assessed By Spike-Triggered Averaging and Intraneural Microstimulation J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2515 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.M.G.J. van Eijden and S.J.J. Turkawski Morphology and Physiology of Masticatory Muscle Motor Units Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2001; 12(1): 76 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Fuglevand and S. S. Segal Simulation of motor unit recruitment and microvascular unit perfusion: spatial considerations J Appl Physiol, October 1, 1997; 83(4): 1223 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.H.S. Kwa, J.A.M. Korfage, and W.A. Weijs Function-dependent Anatomical Parameters of Rabbit Masseter Motor Units Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1995; 74(10): 1649 - 1657. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.A. Weijs, P.J.W. Juch, S.H.S. Kwa, and J.A.M. Korfage Motor Unit Territories and Fiber Types in Rabbit Masseter Muscle Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1993; 72(11): 1491 - 1498. [PDF]