JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 149-166, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vanner, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vanner, S. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 1 149-166, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Differences in somatic and dendritic specific membrane resistivity of spinal motoneurons: an electrophysiological study of neck and shoulder motoneurons in the cat

P. K. Rose and S. J. Vanner
Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

1. The voltage response to a hyperpolarizing current step was used to estimate the electrotonic structure of neck and shoulder motoneurons in anesthetized cats. The coefficients (a0 and a1) and time constants (tau 0 and tau 1) of the first two exponential terms of the series of exponential terms whose sum represented the slope of the voltage response were calculated using a standardized "peeling" technique. 2. Input resistance, membrane time constant, and electrotonic length were similar to values reported for other spinal motoneurons. The voltage response of most neck and shoulder motoneurons had a slow, nonlinear component, commonly known as sag, which is also a feature of other spinal motoneurons. Estimates of motoneuron surface area were up to two times larger than the surface area of hindlimb motoneurons. 3. It was possible to estimate electrotonic length and the ratio of the dendritic conductance to the somatic conductance using Johnston's technique for only 6 of 51 motoneurons examined. The responses of these motoneurons were identical to the responses of equivalent cylinder models that had an electrotonic structure derived from the application of Johnston's technique. 4. We were unable to use Johnston's technique for the remaining motoneurons because the ratio, a1/a0, exceeded 2.0. For these motoneurons it was usually impossible to find an equivalent cylinder model whose response matched the experimental data. The failure of equivalent cylinder models to accurately predict the responses of neck and shoulder motoneurons could not be attributed to the sag process or the dendritic geometry of these cells. 5. The electrotonic structure of a group of these motoneurons was further examined using the somatic shunt model developed by Durand and Kawato. After shifting the base line of the experimental records by 1-2 mV in the depolarizing direction, it was possible to find a somatic shunt model whose response was identical to the experimentally recorded voltage response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Grande, T. V. Bui, and P. K. Rose
Estimates of the Location of L-type Ca2+ Channels in Motoneurons of Different Sizes: A Computational Study
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4023 - 4035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. V. Bui, M. Ter-Mikaelian, D. Bedrossian, and P. K. Rose
Computational Estimation of the Distribution of L-type Ca2+ Channels in Motoneurons Based on Variable Threshold of Activation of Persistent Inward Currents
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 225 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. G. Maltenfort, M. L. McCurdy, C. A. Phillips, V. V. Turkin, and T. M. Hamm
Location and Magnitude of Conductance Changes Produced by Renshaw Recurrent Inhibition in Spinal Motoneurons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1417 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. G. Maltenfort and T. M. Hamm
Estimation of the Electrical Parameters of Spinal Motoneurons Using Impedance Measurements
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1433 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Taylor and R. M. Enoka
Quantification of the Factors That Influence Discharge Correlation in Model Motor Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 796 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. V. Bui, S. Cushing, D. Dewey, R. E. Fyffe, and P. K. Rose
Comparison of the Morphological and Electrotonic Properties of Renshaw Cells, Ia Inhibitory Interneurons, and Motoneurons in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2900 - 2918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online