JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 59: 1814-1830, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Capaday, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Capaday, C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 6 1814-1830, Copyright © 1988 by APS

ARTICLES

The trajectory of human wrist movements

R. B. Stein, F. W. Cody and C. Capaday
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

1. To determine the form of human movement trajectories and the factors that determine this form, normal subjects performed wrist flexion movements against various elastic, viscous, and inertial loads. The subjects were instructed with visual and auditory feedback to make a movement of prescribed amplitude in a present period of time, but were free to choose any trajectory that fulfilled these constraints. 2. The trajectories were examined critically to determine if they corresponded to those which would minimize the root mean square (RMS) value of some kinematic variable or of energy consumption. The data agreed better with the trajectory that minimized the RMS value of jerk (the third derivative of length) than that of acceleration. However, systematic deviations from the minimum jerk predictions were consistently observed whenever movements were made against elastic and viscous loads. 3. Improved agreement could generally be obtained by assuming that the velocity profile varied according to a normal (Gaussian) curve. We conclude that minimization of jerk is not a general principle used by the nervous system in organizing voluntary movements, although movements may approach the predicted form, particularly under inertial loading conditions. 4. The EMG of the agonist muscles consisted of relatively simple waveforms containing ramplike increases and approximately exponential decays. The form of the movements could often be predicted quite well by using the EMG as an input to a linear second-order model of the muscle plus load. Rather than rigorously minimizing a kinematic variable or energy consumption, the nervous system may generate simple waveforms and adjust the parameters of these waveforms by trial and error until a trajectory is achieved that meets the requirements for a given load.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. V. Anderson and A. J. Fuglevand
Probability-Based Prediction of Activity in Multiple Arm Muscles: Implications for Functional Electrical Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 482 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 FAKE JDRHome page
K. Yashiro, T. Yamauchi, M. Fujii, and K. Takada
Smoothness of Human Jaw Movement during Chewing
Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1999; 78(10): 1662 - 1668.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Flanagan and A. M. Wing
The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads
J. Neurosci., February 15, 1997; 17(4): 1519 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online