JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 648-666, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dostrovsky, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dostrovsky, J. O.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 2 648-666, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of feline trigeminal spinal tract nucleus neurons to stimulation of the middle meningeal artery and sagittal sinus

K. D. Davis and J. O. Dostrovsky
Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Canada.

1. Extracellular single-unit activity was recorded from 250 trigeminal (V) spinal tract nucleus neurons that were excited by electrical stimulation of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) and/or sagittal sinus (SS) in anesthetized cats. One hundred and thirty of these neurons were located in the V subnucleus caudalis (Vc), and the remaining 120 neurons were located in the V subnucleus oralis (Vo) or rostral part of the V subnucleus interpolaris (Vi). In many cases these neurons were also examined for the existence of orofacial receptive fields (RFs) by applying mechanical stimuli to the orofacial region. 2. The mean minimum latencies to suprathreshold electrical stimulation of the MMA and the SS were similar for Vc and Vo/Vi neurons. Excitation of Vc neurons occurred at latencies of 14.3 +/- 1.0 (n = 102) and 17.4 +/- 1.6 ms (n = 36) to MMA and SS stimulation, respectively. Excitation of Vo/Vi neurons occurred at latencies of 12.4 +/- 0.9 (n = 86) and 16.4 +/- 1.1 ms (n = 58) to MMA and SS stimulation, respectively. These latencies correspond to mean conduction velocities of approximately 5.2 and 4.0 m/s to MMA and SS stimulation, respectively. 3. Mechanical stimulation of the vessels evoked neuronal responses in five of eight MMA-activated neurons tested and three of five SS-activated neurons tested. 4. Almost all of the neurons tested (127 of 131) had peripheral RFs, and all were in the orofacial region. Nearly all (95%) Vc neurons had RFs within or including the ophthalmic facial region. The RFs of most (67%) Vo/Vi neurons also had RFs within or including ophthalmic regions, but in some cases were only within maxillary and/or mandibular regions. 5. Most of the Vc neurons (87%) were classified on the basis of their cutaneous inputs as nociceptive. The incidence of nociceptive neurons in Vo/Vi was also high (61%), although less than in Vc. In both the Vc and Vo/Vi neuronal populations, MMA-activated neurons were more likely to have nociceptive peripheral inputs than SS-activated neurons. 6. Histological reconstruction of recording sites indicated that the MMA- and/or SS-activated Vc neurons were concentrated in the lateral half of laminae III-V. The responsive neurons at the level of Vo/rostral Vi were not confined to any particular portion of these subnuclei. 7. These findings indicate that sensory afferents that innervate the dural arteries and venous sinuses are capable of activating neurons throughout the V spinal tract nucleus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Strassman and D. Levy
Response Properties of Dural Nociceptors in Relation to Headache
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1298 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Bartsch and P. J. Goadsby
Increased responses in trigeminocervical nociceptive neurons to cervical input after stimulation of the dura mater
Brain, August 1, 2003; 126(8): 1801 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Levy and A. M. Strassman
Mechanical Response Properties of A and C Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating the Rat Intracranial Dura
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3021 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Bartsch and P. J. Goadsby
Stimulation of the greater occipital nerve induces increased central excitability of dural afferent input
Brain, July 1, 2002; 125(7): 1496 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Park, C. Y. Chiang, J. W. Hu, and B. J. Sessle
Neuroplasticity Induced by Tooth Pulp Stimulation in Trigeminal Subnucleus Oralis Involves NMDA Receptor Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 1836 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Malick, R. M. Strassman, and R. Burstein
Trigeminohypothalamic and Reticulohypothalamic Tract Neurons in the Upper Cervical Spinal Cord and Caudal Medulla of the Rat
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2078 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Burstein, M. F. Cutrer, and D. Yarnitsky
The development of cutaneous allodynia during a migraine attack Clinical evidence for the sequential recruitment of spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons in migraine
Brain, August 1, 2000; 123(8): 1703 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Burstein, H. Yamamura, A. Malick, and A. M. Strassman
Chemical Stimulation of the Intracranial Dura Induces Enhanced Responses to Facial Stimulation in Brain Stem Trigeminal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 964 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Ebersberger, M. Ringkamp, P. W. Reeh, and H. O. Handwerker
Recordings From Brain Stem Neurons Responding to Chemical Stimulation of the Subarachnoid Space
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3122 - 3133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. D. Meng, J. W. Hu, A. P. Benetti, and D. A. Bereiter
Encoding of Corneal Input in Two Distinct Regions of the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus in the Rat: Cutaneous Receptive Field Properties, Responses to Thermal and Chemical Stimulation, Modulation by Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls, and Projections to the Parabrachial Area
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. M. Bove and M. A. Moskowitz
Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating Guinea Pig Dura
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 299 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
fake Crit Rev Oral Biol MedHome page
N. F. Capra and D. Dessem
Central Connections of Trigeminal Primary Afferent Neurons: Topographical and Functional Considerations
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1992; 4(1): 1 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online