JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 394-407, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fetter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Proctor, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fetter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Proctor, L. R.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 2 394-407, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Effect of lack of vision and of occipital lobectomy upon recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey

M. Fetter, D. S. Zee and L. R. Proctor
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

1. We investigated the influence of visual experience upon vestibular compensation in monkeys. Two paradigms were used to elicit vestibular adaptation: artificially imposed motion of images upon the retina during head rotation and unilateral labyrinthectomy. Two groups of animals were investigated: monkeys that underwent a bilateral occipital lobectomy and intact monkeys without a cortical lesion. Occipital lobectomy alone caused only a minor change in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR); the gain (eye vel/head vel) decreased slightly (10-15%) for high speeds of rotation (180-300 degrees/s). 2. In response to a 4-h period of continuous oscillation of the head (0.25 Hz, 30 degrees/s) with the visual scene made to move in phase with the head (X0 viewing) or out of phase with the head (X2 viewing), intact monkeys showed an average 40% decrease or increase, respectively, of the VOR gain measured in darkness. After occipital lobectomy this adaptive capability was diminished, primarily for increasing the VOR gain after X2 viewing (42% preop to 13% postop). 3. Unilateral labyrinthectomy in either occipital-lobectomized or in otherwise intact monkeys led to a static imbalance with initial (18- to 20-h postlesion) values of spontaneous nystagmus of 22-62 degrees/s measured in darkness and to a dynamic disturbance with an approximately 50% decrease of VOR gain. Compensation for both abnormalities was studied in three groups of animals: previously occipital-lobectomized monkeys kept in the light after labyrinthectomy, intact monkeys kept in the light after labyrinthectomy, and intact monkeys kept in the dark for 4 days after labyrinthectomy and then exposed to light. Spontaneous nystagmus disappeared at the same rate in each group of animals. VOR gain increased in the intact monkeys kept in the light after labyrinthectomy but not in the intact monkeys kept in the dark after labyrinthectomy until they were exposed to light. The occipital-lobectomized monkeys showed some recovery of VOR gain (approximately 25-40%), but only at low speeds of rotation (30-60 degrees/s). Occipital lobectomy performed in monkeys after they had already compensated for a labyrinthectomy caused the VOR gain to drop to values approximately 0.5 but without any recurrence of spontaneous nystagmus. 4. Our results indicate that visual experience after labyrinthectomy is essential for recovery of VOR gain but not for resolution of spontaneous nystagmus. Furthermore, geniculostriate pathways play a major role in providing information about high velocities of retinal image motion that is necessary for the acquisition of VOR gain adaptation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Deutschlander, K. Hufner, R. Kalla, T. Stephan, T. Dera, S. Glasauer, M. Wiesmann, M. Strupp, and T. Brandt
Unilateral vestibular failure suppresses cortical visual motion processing
Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1025 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Faulstich, A. M. van Alphen, C. Luo, S. du Lac, and C. I. De Zeeuw
Oculomotor Plasticity During Vestibular Compensation Does Not Depend on Cerebellar LTD
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1187 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. M. Stewart, M. J. Mustari, and A. A. Perachio
Visual-Vestibular Interactions During Vestibular Compensation: Role of the Pretectal NOT in Horizontal VOR Recovery After Hemilabyrinthectomy in Rhesus Monkey
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2653 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Dieterich
Easy, Inexpensive, and Effective: Vestibular Exercises for Balance Control
Ann Intern Med, October 19, 2004; 141(8): 641 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Lasker, D. D. Backous, A. Lysakowski, G. L. Davis, and L. B. Minor
Horizontal Vestibuloocular Reflex Evoked by High-Acceleration Rotations in the Squirrel Monkey. II. Responses After Canal Plugging
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1271 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online