JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 58: 752-764, 1987;
0022-3077/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traub, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schneiderman, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traub, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schneiderman, J. H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 58, Issue 4 752-764, Copyright © 1987 by APS


ARTICLES

Models of synchronized hippocampal bursts in the presence of inhibition. II. Ongoing spontaneous population events

R. D. Traub, R. Miles, R. K. Wong, L. S. Schulman and J. H. Schneiderman
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights 10598.

1. We extended our computer model of the CA3 region of the hippocampal slice in order to study spontaneous activity occurring in the presence and absence of synaptic inhibition. This was done by providing a steady inward current to the excitatory neurons, whose value was randomly chosen for each cell. With the parameters used, many of the excitatory cells would, if synaptically isolated, remain quiescent, whereas others would burst periodically with periods as brief as 750 ms. Simulations were run for as long as 10 s of neural activity. 2. In the presence of synaptic inhibition, neural activity became organized into recurring, partially synchronized events: clusters of neurons (6% to 12% of the population) would discharge together, with a period averaging 340 ms, shorter than the burst period of any individual neuron. A consequence of periodic clusters of cellular bursts was the widespread occurrence of periodic synchronized synaptic potentials, as have been observed in hippocampal slices and human temporal neocortical slices. The periods between these synaptic potentials are similar in the model to those observed experimentally. 3. The period could be slowed by either increasing the time constant of the slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP), or by making the excitatory synapses more powerful. The period seems to be generated in part as follows. Consider those cells with rapid spontaneous discharge rates. An upper bound for the period corresponds to the interval between 1) such a cell's becoming responsive enough to an excitatory synaptic input to burst, and 2) such a cell's bursting spontaneously (i.e., in response to its own intrinsic inward current). For cells with rapid spontaneous discharge rates, the interval defined in this way is approximately 350 ms. 4. Different cells participated in each cluster. A given cluster was initiated by one cell or by two cells bursting together, and spread via excitatory synapses. Excitatory synaptic paths could be traced from the initiating cell(s), directly or through other participants, to all cells participating in a cluster. Spread of activity was limited by two mechanisms, so that not all cells synaptically excited by a participating cell would themselves participate. First, cells might be refractory from having participated in a recent cluster (since the intercluster period was less than the refractory time from a cellular burst to its responsiveness to a synaptic stimulus). Second, some cells might be synaptically inhibited. Synaptic inhibition in this model did not act rapidly enough to suppress the cluster totally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L.-R. Shao and F. E. Dudek
Increased Excitatory Synaptic Activity and Local Connectivity of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells in Rats With Kainate-Induced Epilepsy
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1366 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. C. Bush, D. A. Prince, and K. D. Miller
Increased Pyramidal Excitability and NMDA Conductance Can Explain Posttraumatic Epileptogenesis Without Disinhibition: A Model
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1748 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. W. Lytton, D. Contreras, A. Destexhe, and M. Steriade
Dynamic Interactions Determine Partial Thalamic Quiescence in a Computer Network Model of Spike-and-Wave Seizures
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1997; 77(4): 1679 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Traub, R Miles, and R. Wong
Model of the origin of rhythmic population oscillations in the hippocampal slice
Science, March 10, 1989; 243(4896): 1319 - 1325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Sejnowski, C Koch, and P. Churchland
Computational neuroscience
Science, September 9, 1988; 241(4871): 1299 - 1306.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online