JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 58: 417-426, 1987;
0022-3077/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 58, Issue 2 417-426, Copyright © 1987 by APS


ARTICLES

In-parallel and in-series behavior of human muscle spindle endings

D. Burke, A. M. Aniss and S. C. Gandevia
Department of Neurology, Prince Henry Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

1. The responses of 62 putative muscle spindle afferents innervating the pretibial flexor muscles of normal human subjects were studied during graded twitch contractions of the receptor-bearing muscle to search for possible in-series coupling between spindle endings and motor units. 2. The majority of afferents (n = 57) responded unequivocally in an in-parallel manner to the twitch contractions, regardless of contraction strength. There were two patterns of in-parallel response: afferents without background activity discharged during the relaxation phase of the twitch; afferents with a background discharge were transiently silenced during the contraction phase and resumed their discharge on the relaxation phase. 3. Evidence of in-series coupling was found for five afferents during submaximal twitch contractions, to which each afferent responded in a mixed "biphasic" manner, with increases in discharge during both the contraction and relaxation phases of the twitch. Background discharge, response to stretch, and response during isometric voluntary contractions suggested that four of the afferents innervated primary spindle endings and the fifth a secondary spindle ending. 4. It is argued that the five atypical spindle endings responded in an ambiguous manner during twitch contractions of the receptor-bearing muscle because there was an in-series mechanical coupling between motor units and the spindle. The incidence of demonstrable in-series responses has serious implications for the mechanisms of spindle activation during normal motor behavior, but has only minor implications for the use of the twitch test to identify muscle spindle endings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. J. Cordo, C. Flores-Vieira, S. M. P. Verschueren, J. T. Inglis, and V. Gurfinkel
Position Sensitivity of Human Muscle Spindles: Single Afferent and Population Representations
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1186 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online