|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 58, Issue 1 33-65, Copyright © 1987 by APS
ARTICLES |
R. C. Emerson, M. C. Citron, W. J. Vaughn and S. A. Klein
1. We have analyzed receptive fields (RFs) of directionally selective (DS) complex cells in the striate cortex of the cat. We determined the extent to which the DS of a complex cell depends on spatially identifiable subunits within the RF by studying responses to an optimally oriented, three-luminance-valued, gratinglike stimulus that was spatiotemporally randomized. 2. We identified subunits by testing for nonlinear spatial RF interactions. To do this, we calculated Wiener-like kernels in a spatial superposition test that depended on two RF positions at a time. The spatial and temporal separation of light and dark bars at these two positions varied over a spatial range of 8 degrees and a temporal range of +/- 112 ms in increments of 0.5 degree and 16 ms, respectively. 3. DS responses in complex cells cannot be explained by their responses to single light or dark bars because any linear superposition of responses whose time course is uniform across space shows no directional preference. 4. Nonlinear interactions between a flashed reference bar that is fixed in position and a second bar that is flashed at surrounding positions help explain DS by showing multiplicative-type facilitation for bar pairs that mimic motion in the preferred direction and suppression for bar pairs that mimic motion in the null direction. Interactions in the preferred direction have an optimal space/time ratio (velocity), exhibited by elongated, obliquely oriented positive domains in a space-time coordinate frame. This relationship is inseparable in space-time. The slope of the long axis specifies the preferred speed, and its negative agrees with the most strongly suppressed speed in the opposite direction. 5. When the reference bar position is moved across the RF, the spatiotemporal interaction moves with it. This suggests the existence of a family of nearly uniform subunits distributed across the RF. We call the subunit interaction, as averaged across the RF, the "motion kernel" because its spatial and temporal variables are those necessary to specify the velocity, the only parameter that distinguishes a moving image from a temporally modulated stationary image. The nonlinear interaction shows a spatial periodicity, which suggests a mechanism of velocity selectivity for moving extended images.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Chen, F. Han, M.-m. Poo, and Y. Dan Excitatory and suppressive receptive field subunits in awake monkey primary visual cortex (V1) PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 19120 - 19125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Finn and D. Ferster Computational Diversity in Complex Cells of Cat Primary Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9638 - 9648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Sasaki and I. Ohzawa Internal Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of Complex Cells in the Early Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1194 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Pack, B. R. Conway, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 893 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Conway, A. Kitaoka, A. Yazdanbakhsh, C. C. Pack, and M. S. Livingstone Neural Basis for a Powerful Static Motion Illusion J. Neurosci., June 8, 2005; 25(23): 5651 - 5656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Krekelberg and T. D. Albright Motion Mechanisms in Macaque MT J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2908 - 2921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lampl, D. Ferster, T. Poggio, and M. Riesenhuber Intracellular Measurements of Spatial Integration and the MAX Operation in Complex Cells of the Cat Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2704 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Frazor, D. G. Albrecht, W. S. Geisler, and A. M. Crane Visual Cortex Neurons of Monkeys and Cats: Temporal Dynamics of the Spatial Frequency Response Function J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2607 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Conway and M. S. Livingstone Space-Time Maps and Two-Bar Interactions of Different Classes of Direction-Selective Cells in Macaque V-1 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2726 - 2742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Livingstone and B. R. Conway Substructure of Direction-Selective Receptive Fields in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2743 - 2759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Sceniak, M. J. Hawken, and R. Shapley Contrast-Dependent Changes in Spatial Frequency Tuning of Macaque V1 Neurons: Effects of a Changing Receptive Field Size J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 1363 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Reid and R. M. Shapley Space and Time Maps of Cone Photoreceptor Signals in Macaque Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 6158 - 6175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Escabi and C. E. Schreiner Nonlinear Spectrotemporal Sound Analysis by Neurons in the Auditory Midbrain J. Neurosci., May 15, 2002; 22(10): 4114 - 4131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Ibbotson and C.W.G. Clifford Interactions Between ON and OFF Signals in Directional Motion Detectors Feeding the NOT of the Wallaby J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 997 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 874 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information II. Complex Cells J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 909 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cai, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman Spatiotemporal Receptive Field Organization in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cats and Kittens J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1045 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ohzawa, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman Encoding of Binocular Disparity by Complex Cells in the Cat's Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 2879 - 2909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Jagadeesh, H. Wheat, and D Ferster Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex Science, December 17, 1993; 262(5141): 1901 - 1904. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |