|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 54, Issue 1 123-133, Copyright © 1985 by APS
ARTICLES |
I. Suzuki, S. J. Timerick and V. J. Wilson
In decerebrate cats, we have studied the response of neurons in the L3-L6 segments of the spinal cord to stimulation of neck and vestibular receptors. Neck receptors were stimulated by head rotation in labyrinthectomized cats or by body rotation with the head fixed in labyrinth-intact cats. Vestibular receptors were stimulated by whole-body tilt in the latter preparation. Most neurons were located outside the motoneuron nuclei and were arbitrarily classified as interneurons. Combinations of roll and pitch stimuli at frequencies of 0.1 or 0.05 Hz were used to determine the horizontal component of the polarization vector, i.e., the best direction of tilt, for each neuron. Two types of stimuli were used; rotation of a fixed angle of tilt around the head or body ("wobble," Ref. 22) or sinusoidal stimuli in several planes. Polarization vectors of the responses to neck stimulation were widely distributed; different neurons responded best to roll, pitch, and angles in between. For every neuron, the amplitude of the response decreased as the cosine of the angle between the direction of maximal sensitivity and the plane of the stimulus. The direction of the vector remained stable as the frequency of stimulation was varied. Neurons with different vectors had similar dynamics that resembled those of cervical interneurons (27). Many neurons responded to both neck and vestibular stimulation, although the vestibular response usually had a much lower gain. Neck and vestibular vectors were approximately opposite in direction. We suggest that neck responses originate in receptors, probably spindles, in perivertebral muscles. Each of these muscles presumably is best stretched by a particular direction of pull. It seems likely that convergence from receptors in selected muscles determines the direction of a spinal neuron's vector. Vestibular responses probably are due mainly to activity in otolith afferents.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Marchand-Pauvert, G. Nicolas, P. Marque, C. Iglesias, and E. Pierrot-Deseilligny Increase in group II excitation from ankle muscles to thigh motoneurones during human standing J. Physiol., July 1, 2005; 566(1): 257 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bosco and R. E. Poppele Proprioception From a Spinocerebellar Perspective Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Salzman and W. Newsome Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision Science, April 8, 1994; 264(5156): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Georgopoulos, M Taira, and A Lukashin Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex Science, April 2, 1993; 260(5104): 47 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Georgopoulos, A. Schwartz, and R. Kettner Neuronal population coding of movement direction Science, September 26, 1986; 233(4771): 1416 - 1419. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |