JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 1244-1265, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spitzer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hochstein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spitzer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hochstein, S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 5 1244-1265, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Simple- and complex-cell response dependences on stimulation parameters

H. Spitzer and S. Hochstein

We studied the response time course and amplitude dependence on stimulation parameters in cat cortical visual neurons to determine their receptive-field spatial-summation characteristics. Response poststimulus time (PST) histograms of cortical simple cells to contrast-reversal grating stimulation generally have a single peak for each stimulus temporal cycle, though the responses appear rectified. In response to contrast-reversal grating stimulation the general PST histogram time course for complex cells is two peaks, though often these peaks are of different amplitudes. The time course of complex-cell responses, and the ratio of these two response peaks often varies with stimulation parameters. The appearance of a single response peak in simple cells is reflected in the dominance of the odd harmonic Fourier portion, whereas the half-wave rectification leads to a considerable even harmonic portion. Still, this even portion is never significantly greater than the odd portion. When complex cell PST histograms have two nearly equal peaks, Fourier transformation reveals almost only even harmonic components. When the histogram contains two peaks of unequal amplitude Fourier analysis reveals large odd and even components. An even:odd Fourier harmonic portion ratio larger than 1 may be seen as a defining characteristic of complex cells, differentiating them from simple cells. Histograms with two unequal peaks appear "mixed," containing something of the "pure" single-peaked response and something of the pure double-peaked response. The degree to which the response is mixed may be measured by the ratio of the even:odd portion amplitudes. There is a great degree of variability with stimulation parameters (both spatial phase and spatial frequency) of the time course of mixed responses as opposed to the case of responses that have two equal peaks independent of stimulation grating phase and frequency. In both simple and complex cells there is a close coincidence of the spatial frequency ranges over which the even and odd portions are substantial, though many complex cells show a periodic variation of the even:odd portions ratio. This spatial-frequency dependence differs from that of LGN Y-cells where the odd portion dominates at low spatial frequencies and the even portion at high spatial frequencies. The ratio of even-to-odd portion cut-off is close to 3:1 in all Y-cells, a characteristic we did not find in cortical simple or complex cells. We suggest, therefore, that the nonlinearity of these complex cells does not derive from that of Y-cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Crook, B. B. Peterson, O. S. Packer, F. R. Robinson, P. D. Gamlin, J. B. Troy, and D. M. Dacey
The Smooth Monostratified Ganglion Cell: Evidence for Spatial Diversity in the Y-Cell Pathway to the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Superior Colliculus in the Macaque Monkey
J. Neurosci., November 26, 2008; 28(48): 12654 - 12671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Crook, B. B. Peterson, O. S. Packer, F. R. Robinson, J. B. Troy, and D. M. Dacey
Y-Cell Receptive Field and Collicular Projection of Parasol Ganglion Cells in Macaque Monkey Retina
J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11277 - 11291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. Bardy, J. Y. Huang, C. Wang, T. FitzGibbon, and B. Dreher
'Simplification' of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and 'feedback' inactivation
J. Physiol., August 1, 2006; 574(3): 731 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Mata and D. L. Ringach
Spatial Overlap of ON and OFF Subregions and Its Relation to Response Modulation Ratio in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 919 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Tao, M. Shelley, D. McLaughlin, and R. Shapley
An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex
PNAS, January 6, 2004; 101(1): 366 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. P. Kording, C. Kayser, W. Einhauser, and P. Konig
How Are Complex Cell Properties Adapted to the Statistics of Natural Stimuli?
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 206 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C.-I Yeh, C. R. Stoelzel, and J.-M. Alonso
Two Different Types of Y Cells in the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1852 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Aronov, D. S. Reich, F. Mechler, and J. D. Victor
Neural Coding of Spatial Phase in V1 of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3304 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kagan, M. Gur, and D. M. Snodderly
Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of V1 Neurons of Alert Monkeys: Comparison With Responses to Gratings
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2557 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Sceniak, M. J. Hawken, and R. Shapley
Contrast-Dependent Changes in Spatial Frequency Tuning of Macaque V1 Neurons: Effects of a Changing Receptive Field Size
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 1363 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Mechler, D. S. Reich, and J. D. Victor
Detection and Discrimination of Relative Spatial Phase by V1 Neurons
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 6129 - 6157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Wielaard, M. Shelley, D. McLaughlin, and R. Shapley
How Simple Cells Are Made in a Nonlinear Network Model of the Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 5203 - 5211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. D. Victor and K. P. Purpura
Spatial Phase and the Temporal Structure of the Response to Gratings in V1
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 554 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. W. Kjaer, T. J. Gawne, J. A. Hertz, and B. J. Richmond
Insensitivity of V1 Complex Cell Responses to Small Shifts in the Retinal Image of Complex Patterns
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3187 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Jagadeesh, H. S. Wheat, L. L. Kontsevich, C. W. Tyler, and D. Ferster
Direction Selectivity of Synaptic Potentials in Simple Cells of the Cat Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2772 - 2789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online