JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 1194-1200, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calancie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bawa, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calancie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bawa, P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 5 1194-1200, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Voluntary and reflexive recruitment of flexor carpi radialis motor units in humans

B. Calancie and P. Bawa

The order of recruitment of flexor carpi radialis (FCR) motor units was studied during voluntary and reflexive activation of the motoneuron pool for two adult subjects. During slow "voluntary" activation, the recruitment threshold for tonic motoneuron firing was determined, and then the twitch profile of the motor unit was computed by the spike-triggered averaging technique. A positive correlation (r = 0.79 and 0.68 for the two subjects, respectively) between recruitment threshold and twitch amplitude implies that recruitment of FCR motoneurons during slow ramp isometric contractions proceeds in order of increasing size. The accompanying paper describes the behavior of single motor units during the short- and long-latency periods of the stretch reflex. When the effects of sufficient voluntary facilitation (preload) combined with a sufficiently large torque step were just adequate to cause a motor unit to fire during the stretch reflex, its response was virtually always confined to the long-latency period. In addition, the first unit to begin responding to muscle stretch always had the lowest voluntary recruitment threshold relative to other units "visible" at that recording site. By making this unit tonic, the reflex response to the same load increased substantially during the short-latency reflex period, while a second unit increased its reflex response probability during the long-latency period. Thus the voluntary recruitment order of two or more motor units is preserved during the stretch reflex, and is in fact maintained within first the long-latency and then short-latency components of this reflex.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Pruszynski, I. Kurtzer, and S. H. Scott
Rapid Motor Responses Are Appropriately Tuned to the Metrics of a Visuospatial Task
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 224 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Wallace, B. H. Ross, and C. K. Thomas
Motor unit behavior during clonus
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2166 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Khodiguian, A. Cornwell, E. Lares, P. A. DiCaprio, and S. A. Hawkins
Expression of the bilateral deficit during reflexively evoked contractions
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 171 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. S. Turker and R. K. Powers
Effects of Large Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs on Motoneuron Discharge Rate and Probability
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 829 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online