JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 1158-1178, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braastad, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braastad, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 5 1158-1178, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Development of spatial receptive-field organization and orientation selectivity in kitten striate cortex

B. O. Braastad and P. Heggelund

The functional organization of the receptive field of neurons in striate cortex of kittens from 8 days to 3 mo of age was studied by extracellular recordings. A quantitative dual-stimulus technique was used, which allowed for analysis of both enhancement and suppression zones in the receptive field. Furthermore the development of orientation selectivity was studied quantitatively in the same cells. Already in the youngest kittens the receptive fields were spatially organized like adult fields, with a central zone and adjacent flanks that responded in opposite manner to the light stimulus. The relative suppression in the subzones was as strong as in adult cells. Both simple and complex cells were found from 8 days. The receptive fields were like magnified adult fields. The width of the dominant discharge-field zone and the distance between the positions giving maximum discharge and maximum suppression decreased with age in the same proportions. The decrease could be explained by a corresponding decrease of the receptive-field-center size of retinal ganglion cells. Forty percent of the cells were orientation selective before 2 wk, and the fraction increased to 94% at 4 wk. Cells whose responses could be attenuated to at least half of the maximal response by changes of slit orientation were termed orientation selective. The half-width of the orientation-tuning curves narrowed during the first 5 wk, and this change was most marked in simple cells. The ability of the cells to discriminate between orientations in statistical terms was weak in the youngest kittens due to a large response variability, and showed a more pronounced development than the half-width did. The orientation-tuning curves were fitted by an exponential function, which showed the shape to be adultlike in all age groups. Two kittens were dark reared until recording at 1 mo of age. The spatial receptive-field organization and the orientation selectivity in these kittens were similar to normal-reared kittens at 1 mo. The responsivity of the cells of the dark-reared kittens was lower, and the latency before firing was longer than in the normal-reared kittens of the same age, and these response properties were more similar to those in 1- to 2-wk-old normal kittens. Our results indicate that the spatial organization of the receptive field is innate in most cells and that visual experience is unnecessary for the organization to be maintained and for the receptive-field width to mature during the first month postnatally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. V. Giannikopoulos and U. T. Eysel
Dynamics and specificity of cortical map reorganization after retinal lesions
PNAS, July 11, 2006; 103(28): 10805 - 10810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. R. Candy, A. M. Skoczenski, and A. M. Norcia
Normalization Models Applied to Orientation Masking in the Human Infant
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4530 - 4541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Rucci, G. M. Edelman, and J. Wray
Modeling LGN Responses during Free-Viewing: A Possible Role of Microscopic Eye Movements in the Refinement of Cortical Orientation Selectivity
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4708 - 4720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. C. DeAngelis, G. M. Ghose, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1999; 19(10): 4046 - 4064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Erwin and K. D. Miller
Correlation-Based Development of Ocularly Matched Orientation and Ocular Dominance Maps: Determination of Required Input Activities
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1998; 18(23): 9870 - 9895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Cai, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman
Spatiotemporal Receptive Field Organization in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cats and Kittens
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1045 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online