JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 53: 853-867, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Obara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Obara, S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 4 853-867, Copyright © 1985 by APS

ARTICLES

Afferent facilitation induced by iontophoretic application of acidic amino acids in the ampullary electroreceptors of Plotosus

T. Nagai and S. Obara

In an attempt to identify the afferent transmitter in acousticolateralis receptors, effects of some acidic amino acids were examined in ampullary electroreceptors of the marine catfish Plotosus anguillaris, which have only afferent innervation. The ampulla (sensory epithelium) was first hyperpolarized in situ to suppress receptor-cell activity and release of transmitter, and hence resting afferent discharges completely. In the absence of transmitter, amino acids were applied to the ampulla by iontophoresis through three-barreled electrodes. Afferent impulses were recorded from the nerve trunk by a suction electrode, and single-unit responses were analyzed by their instantaneous frequency (F) records. L-Glutamate (Glu) induces single-unit responses postsynaptically at discrete spots over the ampulla. The F records showed graded and slow time courses, and F peaks increased sigmoidally against Glu doses with Hill coefficients of 2-3. Response maxima reached 120-210 Hz in doses of one log unit over the threshold. Glu response showed little desensitization. At the Glu-sensitive spots, kainate (KA) and quisqualate (QA) induced more persistent excitation and L-homocysteate (HCA) weaker excitation than did Glu, with similar latency. L-Aspartate (Asp) induced small slow responses with long latency in only one third of the tested Glu spots. D-Glutamate (D-Glu), D-aspartate (D-Asp), L-cysteate (CA), L-cysteine sulfinate (CSA), and N-methyl-DL-aspartate generally induced no response. Some aspartate analogues, L- and D-Asp, CA, and CSA induced persistent potentiation of Glu responses. Apparent affinity increase and change in response shape during potentiation indicated suppression of Glu uptake. However, apparent slope change in the log dose-response curves suggested that additional mechanisms were involved. In contrast, QA, KA, Glu, and HCA induced the excitation only. Comparable topical application of the transmitter was simulated by stimulating a few receptor cells at Glu spots to induce focal responses. Some aspects of the focal and Glu responses were compared. Pharmacological and neurochemical evidence so far available on this material is discussed with respect to the Glu hypothesis. Glu, even though a potent agonist in terms of afferent excitation, seems to act on extrasynaptic receptor sites in the nonmyelinated nerve terminals.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online