JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 52: 709-723, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, E. I.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 52, Issue 4 709-723, Copyright © 1984 by APS


ARTICLES

Auditory properties of space-tuned units in owl's optic tectum

E. I. Knudsen

Auditory units in the optic tectum of the barn owl (Tyto alba) were studied under free-field conditions with a movable sound source. These units are selective for sound location and their spatial tuning varies systematically across the tectum, forming a map of space (8). I found that frequency tuning, response latencies, and thresholds of units changed in parallel with their spatial tuning, suggesting that as a consequence these properties also are topographically distributed in the optic tectum. Response rates were determined primarily by the location of the sound source. Regardless of sound intensity, only stimuli delivered from a restricted "best area" elicited vigorous responses. Minimum response latencies were shortest for units with frontal best areas and increased systematically for units with best areas located more peripherally. The response latencies of units with best areas centered within 25 degrees of the owl's visual axis were virtually independent of sound intensity and speaker position. The latencies of units with more peripheral best areas varied with speaker position and were shortest when the speaker was in the best area. Thresholds to noise stimuli were lowest for units with best areas directly in front of the owl and increased systematically for units with best areas located more peripherally. Thus, in the representation of frontal space, where units have the smallest receptive fields and the magnification of space is the greatest (8), units also respond to the weakest sound fields. Many units (20%) could not be driven with tonal stimuli; of those that could, most were broadly tuned for frequency. Characteristic frequencies and high-frequency cutoffs shifted lower as best areas moved peripherally. High-frequency tones, which excited units with frontal best areas, either inhibited or failed to drive units with peripheral best areas. These systematic changes in unit response properties influence how sounds from different locations are represented in the tectum and reflect integrative strategies used by the owl's auditory system in deriving a representation of auditory space.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. A. Maczko, P. F. Knudsen, and E. I. Knudsen
Auditory and Visual Space Maps in the Cholinergic Nucleus Isthmi Pars Parvocellularis of the Barn Owl
J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12799 - 12806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. I. Gold and E. I. Knudsen
A Site of Auditory Experience-Dependent Plasticity in the Neural Representation of Auditory Space in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., May 1, 2000; 20(9): 3469 - 3486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. I. Gold and E. I. Knudsen
Abnormal Auditory Experience Induces Frequency-Specific Adjustments in Unit Tuning for Binaural Localization Cues in the Optic Tectum of Juvenile Owls
J. Neurosci., January 15, 2000; 20(2): 862 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. I. Gold and E. I. Knudsen
Hearing Impairment Induces Frequency-Specific Adjustments in Auditory Spatial Tuning in the Optic Tectum of Young Owls
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2197 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. H. Schnupp and A. J. King
Coding for Auditory Space in the Nucleus of the Brachium of the Inferior Colliculus in the Ferret
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2717 - 2731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online