JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 43: 46-59, 1980;
0022-3077/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denoth, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stanojevic, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denoth, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stanojevic, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 43, Issue 1 46-59, Copyright © 1980 by APS

ARTICLES

Responses of Purkinje cells of cerebellar vermis to sinusoidal rotation of neck

F. Denoth, P. C. Magherini, O. Pompeiano and M. Stanojevic

1. The response of Purkinje (P) cells located in the vermal cortex of the cerebellar anterior lobe to sinusoidal rotation of the neck was investigated in precollicular decerebrate cats. The head of the animal was fixed in a sterotaxic frame while the spinous process of the second cervical vertebra was held by a clamp rigidly fixed to the tilting table. It was then possible to elicit a selective neck input by rotating the neck and the body simultaneously along the longitudinal axis of the animal while maintaining the head in horizontal position. 2. Among the 95 P-cells tested for neck stimulation, 35 units showed a mossy fiber (MF) or a climbing fiber (CF) response to sinusoidal rotation of the axis vertebra at the frequency of 0.026 Hz and at the peak amplitude of displacement of 5--10 degrees. The response consisted in a periodic modulation of the discharge frequency during sinusoidal rotation of the neck. Most of these units were excited during side-down rotation of the neck, but were inhibited during side-up rotation. 3. The threshold amplitude of neck rotation responsible for the MF-induced responses varied in different units from 1 to 3 degrees at the frequency of 0.026 Hz. The sensitivity of the units, expressed in percentage change of the average firing rate per degree of displacement, either did not change or very slightly decreased as a result of increasing amplitude of stimulation from 1--3 degrees to 10--15 degrees at the frequency of 0.026 Hz or by increasing frequency of neck rotation from 0.015 to 0.15 Hz at the amplitude of neck displacement of 5--10 degrees. 4. Changes in amplitude or frequency of stimulation at the parameters reported above did not greatly modify the phase of the unit responses relative to the side-down position of the neck. These findings indicate that the MF and CF responses of P-cells to sinusoidal rotation of the neck depended on changes in neck position and not on changes in velocity of neck rotation. 5. The observation that the majority of responding P-cells located in the vermal cortex of the cerebellar anterior lobe increased their firing rate during side-down rotation of the neck is discussed in relation to the results of stimulation and lesion experiments, indicating that postural changes can be elicited either during asymmetric stimulation of neck receptors or by unilateral interruption of the neck afferents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. T. Gdowski and R. A. McCrea
Integration of Vestibular and Head Movement Signals in the Vestibular Nuclei During Whole-Body Rotation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 436 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online