JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 42: 1437-1449, 1979;
0022-3077/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horch, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horch, K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 5 1437-1449, Copyright © 1979 by APS


ARTICLES

Guidance of regrowing sensory axons after cutaneous nerve lesions in the cat

K. Horch

1. Individual type I sensory neurons in cutaneous nerves typically innervate two to four type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors (Haarscheiben). The extent to which these neurons replicate the original innervation patterns of the type I receptors after peripheral nerve regeneration and the means by which these neurons are guided back to their old receptor sites during regeneration were studied in cats using neurophysiological techniques. 2. By recording activity of type I neurons in small cutaneous nerves and isolated dorsal rootlets, it was possible to map the distribution of these neurons in the skin. Maps made before nerve lesion were compared to maps made after recovery from nerve crush and transection. 3. Fibers regenerating after nerve crush return to their old receptor sites, probably by following their old Schwann tubes in the distal stump of the nerve, and replicate the original receptor innervation pattern. Essentially all the type I fibers successfully regenerate in this case. 4. In contrast, after nerve transection the regenerating fibers do not restore the original innervation pattern, although they do preferentially return to other old type I receptor sites. About 60% of the type I fibers reinnervate the skin after transection. 5. These observations provide a basis for the difference in functional recovery seen after crush and transection lesions of peripheral nerves.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. A. Kuiken, P. D. Marasco, B. A. Lock, R. N. Harden, and J. P. A. Dewald
From the Cover: Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation
PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 20061 - 20066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
fake Crit Rev Oral Biol MedHome page
R. B. Donoff
Nerve Regeneration: Basic and Applied Aspects
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1995; 6(1): 18 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
E. Foster and P.P. Robinson
The Effect of Nerve Injury on the Incidence and Distribution of Branched Pulpal Axons in the Ferret
Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1994; 73(12): 1803 - 1810.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
S. RATH and C. J. GREEN
Lack of Topographical Specificity in Sensory Nerve Regeneration through Muscle Grafts in Rats
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., October 1, 1991; 16(5): 524 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online