Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 4 1061-1082, Copyright © 1979 by APS

ARTICLES

Cutaneous masking. II. Geometry of excitatory andinhibitory receptive fields of single units in somatosensory cortex of the cat

S. E. Laskin and W. A. Spencer

1. The responses of single neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex of the cat to brief air-pulse stimuli were quantitatively examined. These controlled natural stimuli activated almost exclusively rapidly adapting hair units which, on systematic movement of the stimulus through the receptive field, gave unit-response profiles that showed the classical unimodal tent-shaped distribution. 2. Conditioning stimulus-induced inhibition of a response evoked by a fixed test stimulus was measured by systematically moving the conditioning stimulus through the receptive field. The spatial distribution of in-field inhibitory activity was unimodal and highly covariant with that of the conditioning excitation, the peak inhibition corresponding to the functional center of the excitatory receptive field. 3. Nearly one-half of the units studied evidenced inhibition extending beyond the excitatory receptive field, forming a "surround" inhibitory region; but these were usually restricted areas with rather weak inhibitory effects. 4. Time-course measuring revealed, on the average, inhibition effects measureable from 10 ms before to some 70 ms following conditioning stimulation, with peak inhibition delayed some 10--15 ms from the conditioning stimulus onset. We showed the backward inhibition, occurring with the test stimulus delivered before the onset of the conditioning stimulus, to be a property of the test response duration. Inhibition measured in the surround areas had essentially the same time course as the inhibition calculated from measurements made within the receptive fields. 5. The spatial and temporal profiles of the excitatory and inhibitory cortical unitary activity are thus very similar to the parametric features of psychophysical enhancement and masking. These findings suggest that the excitatory and inhibitory activities related to individual stimuli interact in multipoint stimulus paradigms so that simple unimodal composite profiles are synthesized.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Higley and D. Contreras Frequency Adaptation Modulates Spatial Integration of Sensory Responses in the Rat Whisker System J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3819 - 3824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Higley and D. Contreras Cellular Mechanisms of Suppressive Interactions Between Somatosensory Responses In Vivo J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 647 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 791 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-R. Boloori and G. B. Stanley The dynamics of spatiotemporal response integration in the somatosensory cortex of the vibrissa system. J. Neurosci., April 5, 2006; 26(14): 3767 - 3782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Zhang and K. D. Alloway Stimulus-Induced Intercolumnar Synchronization of Neuronal Activity in Rat Barrel Cortex: A Laminar Analysis J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1464 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Webber and G. B. Stanley Nonlinear Encoding of Tactile Patterns in the Barrel Cortex J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2010 - 2022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Derdikman, R. Hildesheim, E. Ahissar, A. Arieli, and A. Grinvald Imaging Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Surround Inhibition in the Barrels Somatosensory Cortex J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3100 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Rema, M. Armstrong-James, and F. F. Ebner Experience-Dependent Plasticity Is Impaired in Adult Rat Barrel Cortex after Whiskers Are Unused in Early Postnatal Life J. Neurosci., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 358 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Yang, I. Seif, and M. Armstrong-James Adult Experience-dependent Plasticity of S1 Barrel Cortex in the Normal and Monoamine Oxidase-A Knockout (Tg8) Mouse Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2002; 12(12): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. III. Effect of Motor Tasks J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1968 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. N. S. Sachdev and K. C. Catania Receptive Fields and Response Properties of Neurons in the Star-Nosed Mole's Somatosensory Fovea J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2602 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 495 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Fanselow and M. A. L. Nicolelis Behavioral Modulation of Tactile Responses in the Rat Somatosensory System J. Neurosci., September 1, 1999; 19(17): 7603 - 7616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Whitsel, O. Favorov, K. A. Delemos, C.-J. Lee, M. Tommerdahl, G. K. Essick, and B. Nakhle SI Neuron Response Variability Is Stimulus Tuned and NMDA Receptor Dependent J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2988 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey J. Neurosci., January 1, 1999; 19(1): 401 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. DiCarlo, K. O. Johnson, and S. S. Hsiao Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey J. Neurosci., April 1, 1998; 18(7): 2626 - 2645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Calford and R Tweedale Interhemispheric transfer of plasticity in the cerebral cortex Science, August 17, 1990; 249(4970): 805 - 807. [Abstract] [PDF]